Evolutionary explanation- attachment is an innate system that gives an survival advantage
Monotropy:
Monotripic- placed great emphasis on a child's attachment to one particular caregiver.
Called this person 'mother'- but not necessarily biological mother
Law of continuity- the more constant and predictable a child's care, the better quality of their attachment.
Law of accumulated separation- effects of separation from mother add up.
Social releasers and critical period:
Innate 'cute' behaviours- smiling, cooing and gripping- socialreleasers as purpose is to activate adult social interaction and make adult attachment to baby.
Critical period- 6 months
Viewed it as a sensitive period- maximally sensitive ay 6 months and possibly extends to 2 or 2 1/2
Internal working model:
Child forms a mental representation of their relationship with their primary caregiver.
Serves as a model for future relationships.
Also IWM affects how the child's later ability to be a parent themselves
Limitation: validity of monotropy challenged
Concept of monotropy lacks validity.
Schaffer and Emerson- although babies did attach to one person, a significant minority formed multiple attachments.
Stronger not different in quality- e.g. other attachments to family members provide all the same key qualities
Means Bowlby may be incorrect that there is a unique quality and importance to the child's primary attachment.
Strength: support for social releasers
Evidence supporting role of social releasers
Brazelton- observed babies trigger interactions with adults using social releasers.
Researchers then instructed primary caregiver to ignore babies' social releasers
Babies became increasingly distressed
Illustrates role of social releasers in emotional development and suggests they are important in the process of attachment development.
Strength: support for IWM
Idea of iwm predicts patterns of attachment passed onto next generation
Bailey- assessed attachment relationships in 99 mothers and their one year old.
Researchers measured the mothers' attachment to their own primary caregiver.
Found that mother with poor attachment to own primary caregiver more likely to have poorly attached babies
Supports Bowbly's idea that mothers' ability to form attachments to their own babies influenced by their iwm.
Counterpoint to support for iwm:
Probably other important influences on social development.
E.g.- some psychologists believe that genetic differences in anxiety and sociability affect social behaviour in both babies and adults.
Means that Bowlby may have overstated the importance of the iwm in social behaviour and parenting at the expense of other factors.