argued internal mental processes should be studied scientifically, contrasting biological approach
studies areas neglected by behaviourists (memory, perception, thinking)
makes inferences about person's mind based on their behaviour
Role of schema
packages of information/ideas about world
act as mental framework for interpretation of incoming information received by cognitive system
babies born with motor schema for innate behaviours
as we age schemas get more detailed
Theoretical/computer models
both methods help understand theoretical processes
information processing approach suggests information flows through cognitive system in a sequence of sages e.g multi-storemodel
Emergence of cognitive neuroscience
study of influence of brain structures on mental processes, focus explained due to use of computer generated models
Strengths 1
use of objective scientific methods - lab studies provides reliable/objective results, emergence of cognitive neuroscience allowed for biology and cognitive psychology to come together, meaning cognitive approach has some credibility as it has scientific basis
Counterpoint 1
however - relies on influence of mental processes, therefore can be too abstract and theoretical. research also carried out using artificial stimuli therefore lacks external validity
Strength 2
real-world application - made important contribution to AI and development of robots, supports value of cognitive approach
Limitation
based on machine reductionism - ignores the influence of human emotion/motivation on cognitive system and how this may affect the ability to process information, suggests machine reductionism may weaken validity of cognitive approach