3 sections- first assessed respondents' current or most important relationship, second assessed general love experiences such as number of partners and third assessed attachment type by asking to choose which of three statements best described their feelings
The Love quiz: Hazan and Shaver
Findings- 56% identified as securely attached, with 25% insecure avoidant and 19% insecure resistant
Secure- more likely to have good and longer-lasting relationships
Avoidant- jealousy and fear of intimacy
Internal Working model:
Acts as a template for future relationships
Relationships in childhood:
Securely attached- best quality friendships
Insecure- difficulties with friendships
Wilson and Smith- assessed attachment type and bullying involvement- questionnaires, 196 children aged 7-11 in London
Secure- unlikely to be involved
Insecure-avoidant- most likely to be victims
Insecure-resistant- most likely to be bullies
Strength: research support
Supporting evidence
Fearon and Roisman- concluded that early attachment consistently predicts later attachment, emotional well-being and attachment to own children
Insecure-avoidant- disorganised attachment strongly associated with later mental disorders.
Means secure attachment as a baby appears to convert advantages for future development
Counterpoint to research support:
Not all supports links between early attachment and later attachment
E.g. Regensburg longitudinal study followed 43 individuals from one year of age.
At 16 attachment was assessed using adult attachment interview and no evidence of continuity
Means not clear to what extent quality of early attachment really predicts later development
Limitation: validity issues with retrospective studies
Assessed retrospectively
Most research not longitudinal- don't assess early life and then revisit same person
Instead- usually asked adults questions about their relationship with parents
2 validity problems- relies on honest and accurate answers and hard to know whether what is being assessed is early attachment or in fact adult attachment
Means measures of early attachment used in most studies may be confounded with other factors making them meaningless
Limitation: Confounding variables
Existence of Confounding variables
Associations between attachment quality and later development may be affected by confounding variables
E.g parenting styles may influence both attachment quality and later development
Means we can never be entirely sure that it is early attachment and not some other factors that is influencing later development