physical- changes along the river WEY

    Cards (30)

    • HYPOTHESIS- WIDTH, DEPTH, VELOCITY WILL INCREASE AS YOU GO DOWNSTREAM
    • Why has this been a suitable topic-
      studied it in class- linked to bradshaws model
    • why is this location suitable?
      river is close to where we stayed on the field trip - easily accessible
      river is around 9 km long- shows variation but can study it in a day
    • data collection method 1- river velocity sampling method aimed at systematic sample size 7 sample sites
    • data collection method 1 river velocity-
      measured 5m of the river with tape measure
      dropped a rubber duck and timed how long it took for it to travel the 5m
    • data collection method 1 river velocity
      justification
      provides a measure of velocity at the same sites as width and depth so can calculate discharge
      can be used to show how and why a rivers characteristics are changed downstream
    • data collection method 1 river velocity
      weaknessess
      rubber duck can get stuck in weeds on bank
      can be dropped at different heights- measurements are inaccurate
      human error when using stop watch
    • data collection method 2 river depth sampling method aimed at systematic ( equal spacing of sites) sample size : 7 sample sites
    • data collection method 2 river depth
      tape measure taught across surface of river from bank to bank
      every 50 cm measure depth of water (surface to bed) using verticle ruler
      / width by six
    • data collection method 2 river depth
      justification
      provides a measure of river depth at same sites as the other characteristics
      can be used to show how and why river features are changing
    • data collection method 2 river depth strengths
      quite quick to do
      only needs 3 people
      gets reasonably accurate measurments
    • data collection method 2 river depth weaknessess
      ruler may not be vertical so inaccurate measurements
      tape measure may not be taught so inaccurate measurments
    • risks- drowning due to deep/fast flowing water- teachers stand at either end of river stretch and supervise and not allowed in deeper ends
      weil's disease - can get into open wounds so wear plasters and wash hands when back
      cuts from broken glass- wellies with thick soles
    • date collection method 3 river width
      tape measure taught across the surface of a river from bank to bank
    • data collection method 3 river width
      justification- provides a measure of width at same sites as the other characteristics
      can be used to show how and why a rivers features are changed as you go downstrea,
    • data collection method 3 river width weaknesess- vegetation in the way and might not be taught enough = invalid results
    • data representation method 1 river velocity- scatter gragh
      strengths
      shows relationship between distance downstream
      can assess strength of corelation (line of best fit) clear and visual record
      identify outliars
    • data representation method 1 scattergragh velocity- weaknesess
      plotted on a small scale so reading may be difficult
      interpretation is subjective
    • data presentation method 2 river depth and width- cross sectional graph
      strengths
      visual shows by comparing which sites are deeper
      put graphs next to eachother makes it easy to compare
      identify overall pattern
      easy to draw
    • WHAT OTHER METHODS CAN BE USED TO PRESENT DATA?
      SPEARMANS RANK CORRELATION - STATISTICAL METHOD
    • ANYALASIS- why it proved the brad shaw method
    • analysis- river velocity increased overall with distance downstream
    • velocity analysis- velocity
      AT SITE 1 THE RIVER VELOCITY WAS 0.030 METERS PER SECOND BUT BY SITE 7 IT WAS 0.625
    • analysis- velocity
      anomalies- at site 5 where there had been some human management it was slower ( old mill which means there was less water in the channel)
    • velocity generally increases downstream due to channel shape becoming more semi circular- more water in river (fed by tributaries)
      increased volume has eroded the channel into a more efficient semi circular shape. linked to hydraulic radius downstream.
    • analysis river depth- river depth increased with distance downstream- the depth increased from 1.6cm at site 1 to site 7 61.6cm
    • analysis river depth- at site 5 it became slower- river has been split in order to flow past a now defunct mill this channelling was to prevent flooding and erosion.
    • analysis river depth - as the river flows downstream more tributaries joining it adding volume of water in river. + surface run off. erodes a wider and deeper channel
    • analysis river width- at site 1 the width was 0.42 and increased to 11.02 by site 7 (meters)
    • conclusion- overall we found out that river velocity and depth both increased downstream. this fitted the bradshaw model
    See similar decks