HYPOTHESIS- WIDTH, DEPTH, VELOCITY WILL INCREASE AS YOU GO DOWNSTREAM
Why has this been a suitable topic-
studied it in class- linked to bradshaws model
why is this location suitable?
river is close to where we stayed on the field trip - easily accessible
river is around 9 km long- shows variation but can study it in a day
data collection method 1- river velocity sampling method aimed at systematic sample size 7 sample sites
data collection method 1 river velocity-
measured 5m of the river with tape measure
dropped a rubber duck and timed how long it took for it to travel the 5m
data collection method 1 river velocity
justification
provides a measure of velocity at the same sites as width and depth so can calculate discharge
can be used to show how and why a rivers characteristics are changed downstream
data collection method 1 river velocity
weaknessess
rubber duck can get stuck in weeds on bank
can be dropped at different heights- measurements are inaccurate
human error when using stop watch
data collection method 2 river depth sampling method aimed at systematic ( equal spacing of sites) sample size : 7 sample sites
data collection method 2 river depth
tape measure taught across surface of river from bank to bank
every 50 cm measure depth of water (surface to bed) using verticle ruler
/ width by six
data collection method 2 river depth
justification
provides a measure of river depth at same sites as the other characteristics
can be used to show how and why river features are changing
data collection method 2 river depth strengths
quite quick to do
only needs 3 people
gets reasonably accurate measurments
data collection method 2 river depth weaknessess
ruler may not be vertical so inaccurate measurements
tape measure may not be taught so inaccurate measurments
risks- drowning due to deep/fast flowing water- teachers stand at either end of river stretch and supervise and not allowed in deeper ends
weil's disease - can get into open wounds so wear plasters and wash hands when back
cuts from broken glass- wellies with thick soles
date collection method 3 river width
tape measure taught across the surface of a river from bank to bank
data collection method 3 river width
justification- provides a measure of width at same sites as the other characteristics
can be used to show how and why a rivers features are changed as you go downstrea,
data collection method 3 river width weaknesess- vegetation in the way and might not be taught enough = invalid results
data representation method 1 river velocity- scatter gragh
strengths
shows relationship between distance downstream
can assess strength of corelation (line of best fit) clear and visual record
identify outliars
data representation method 1 scattergragh velocity- weaknesess
plotted on a small scale so reading may be difficult
interpretation is subjective
data presentation method 2 river depth and width- cross sectional graph
strengths
visual shows by comparing which sites are deeper
put graphs next to eachother makes it easy to compare
identify overall pattern
easy to draw
WHAT OTHER METHODS CAN BE USED TO PRESENT DATA?
SPEARMANS RANK CORRELATION - STATISTICAL METHOD
ANYALASIS- why it proved the brad shaw method
analysis- river velocityincreased overall with distancedownstream
velocity analysis- velocity
AT SITE 1 THE RIVER VELOCITY WAS 0.030 METERS PER SECOND BUT BY SITE 7 IT WAS 0.625
analysis- velocity
anomalies- at site 5 where there had been some human management it was slower ( old mill which means there was less water in the channel)
velocity generally increasesdownstream due to channelshape becoming more semicircular- more water in river (fed by tributaries)
increasedvolume has eroded the channel into a more efficient semi circular shape. linked to hydraulicradiusdownstream.
analysis river depth- river depth increased with distance downstream- the depth increased from 1.6cm at site 1 to site 761.6cm
analysis river depth- at site 5 it became slower- river has been splitinordertoflowpast a nowdefunctmill this channellingwastopreventfloodinganderosion.
analysis riverdepth - as the river flows downstream more tributaries joining it adding volume of water in river. + surface run off. erodes a wider and deeper channel
analysis river width- at site 1 the width was 0.42 and increased to 11.02 by site 7 (meters)
conclusion- overall we found out that river velocity and depth both increased downstream. this fitted the bradshaw model