Why was weymouth a good example- provides a good example of regeneration on a measurable scale ( within a day)
why was weymouth a suitable location- areas of regenerated and unregenerated in the past 20 years. near where we stayed on the field trip (easily accessable)
date collection method 1- questionnaire- attitudes towards regeneration.
data method 1 questionaire- random ( remove bias) sample size 1 per person
data collection method 1 questionaire- justification- provides peoples views
regeneration and its positive and negative impacts
Data collection method 1 questionaire- strengths-
simple and easy to understand
helps collect peoples veiws quickly.
data collection method 1 questionaire- weakness
not everyone stops so sample age biased
some people may not fully understand the question limited sample size
data collection method 2- environmental quality survey (eqs)
sampling method- 1 per group at each site- randomly selecting where to do survey removes bias = more accuracy
data collection method 2 environmental survey- description of method
completed eqs for each site making judgments about the impact of urban regeneration 12 categories assessed from -3 to 3
data collection method 2 environmental quality survey - justification- provides an overview of the impact of regeneration on the environment of the 2 sample sites (brewers quay and pavilion) quantitative result so can compare
date collection method 2 environmental quality - strengths
provides an overview of the environmental impact
compare individual and total scores for each site
averages reduce the impact of outliars
date collection method 2- environmental quality survey- weaknesses-
subjective- biased opinions
only visisted 2 sites
urban regeneration in weymouth risks- traffic being hit by a car- mitigated by crossing roads together in a line while being supervised by teachers
urban regeneration in weymouth risks- working in the town centre means you could get lost- worked in small groups and had eachothers phone numbers
data collection method 3- pedestrian count
sampling method- systematic
sample size- 1 person at each location
data collection method 3- pedistrain count
description of method-
counting the number of people at each site ( paviallan and brewers quay)
data collection method 3 pedistrain count strengths
simple and easy to do collect data easily
data collection method 3 pedistrian coun weakness
limited sample size only (5 minutes in one location)
may have mis counted or counted twice
data collection method 3 pedestrian count justifcation
shows wether regenerated areas are busier then non
combined group scores and calculated a mean for each site
data presentation methods- method 1 - barcharts/ piecharts (questionaires)
data representation method 1 pie charts and bar charts strengths
useful for comparing things between different groups
put them next to eachother and can compare easily
quite visual- helps identify similarities and differences
data representing method 1 pie charts and bar charts weaknesses
quite simplistic
required people to make visual comparisons- subjective opinions
data representing method 2 - bi-polar diagram (using eqs data)
strengths
group average is provided which reduces the impact of outliars
summary of diagram is visual- easy to see main differences between 2 sites
size of shaded areas make easier to compare
data representing method 2 bi polar diagram EQS WEAKNESSESS
interpretation of diagram is subjective- based on people making a visual interpretation
data presentation method 3- flowline map pedestrian count
quick and easy to make visual way to compare
data representation method 3 flow line map pedestrian count
weaknessess
subjective scale is used to quite small so difficult to show differences between locations
WHAT OTHER METHODS CAN BE USED TO PRESENT YOUR DATA?
could have presented the environmental quality survey on bar charts
HYPOTHOSIS- URBAN REGENERATION HAS HAD A POSITIVE IMPACT