when a person conforms in order to be accepted/belong to a group
informational social influence (ISI)
when a person conforms because they have a desire to be right, and look to others who they believe may have more information
compliance
when individuals publicly agree with the majority view, but privately disagrees - temporary (a need to be accepted by the group)
identification
when individuals change their public behaviour and private views when in the presence of the group, but not permanently (they begin to identify with the group)
internalisation
when individuals genuinely change their behaviour to that of a group/person because they see their views are 'correct' - views now expressed publicly and privately
variables affecting conformity
difficulty of task
size of the majority
unanimity
variable affecting conformity - difficulty of task
harder task: conformity increases - pts are uncertain and look to others for guidance (ISI)
easier task: conformity decreases - more certain, independent behaviour
variable affecting conformity -size of the majority
small group: conformity decreases - pts under pressure to say same answer as majority
large group: conformity increases - but more than 3~5 confederates did not increase conformity
variable affecting conformity - unanimity
unanimous verdict: conformity stays high, all confederates stick to the same unanimous wrong answer
disturbed unanimity: conformity decreases, not excluded
variable affecting conformity - pts answering in private
pts who wrote their answer rather than vocalise them: conformity decreases, less group pressure (NSI not as powerful)
deindividuation
when people lose their sense of socialised individual identity and resort to unsocialised and anti-social behaviour
learned helplessness
a state that occurs after a person has experienced a stressful situation repeatedly and believe that they are unable to change or control the situation, so no longer try (even when there are opportunities for change)
resisting social influence
the ability of people to withstand the social pressure to conform to the majority or obey authority
situational factors
a theory that suggest behaviour is caused by the situation an individual finds themselves in
dispositionalfactors
a theory that suggests that behaviour is caused due to something to do with the person (e.g. personality trait)
conformity
the tendency for a person to change their behaviour/beliefs in response to perceivedpressure from other people in a group
Asch's aim
to investigate the extent to which social erasure from a majority group could affect a person to conform
Asch's procedure
50pts were selected out of 123male uni students
1 naive pts was seated 6th in a row of 7-9 confederates
the naive pts were told the task was to examine perceptual judgements, and were instructed to pick which of 3 lines 'matched' line X
it was an unambiguous task
Asch'sresults
naivepts gave the wrong answer 37% of the time
5% of naive pts conformed on every critical trial
25% of pts remained completely independent (did not conform)
75% of pts conformed at least once
Asch's procedure
50pts were selected out of 123maleuni students
1 naive pts was seated 6th in a row of 7-9 confederates
the naive pts were told the task was to examine perceptual judgements, and were instructed to pick which of 3 lines 'matched' line X
it was an unambiguous task
in 12/18 of the trials (the critical trials) the confederates gave the wrong answer, 6/12 said longer line matched line X, 6/12 said shorter line matched line X
Asch's conclusion
people conform for 2 reasons:
to fit in with the group = normative social influence
believe the group[ is more informed than they are = informational social influence
Zimbardo's simulated prison observation - aim
to investigate the extent to which people would conform to the roles of the guard + prisoner in a role playing simulation of prison life
Zimbardo'ssimulatedprison observation - procedure
24 male college students selected from those who responded to an advert in the paper
pts were randomly allocated to either the role as a guard or a prisoner
guards: welcomed to the 'prison', given guard uniform, billy club and reflective sunglasses (avoid eye contact with prisoners)
prisoners: pts were arrested at their house without warning (deception), when arrived to the 'prison' they were stripped, given prison clothes + stripped, only reffered to by number
Zimbardo'ssimulated prison observation - results
only 10% of the time were pts conversations about life outside of prison
prisoners + guards quickly conformed to their social roles
prisoners were punished by doing push up in the middle of the night, cleaning the toilet with their bare hands etc.
the experiment was terminated after 6 days (instead of 2 weeks) due to the abuse the prisoners had to suffer
deindividuation: guards wore uniforms which may have given them a sense of responsibility/explanation for their behaviour
learned helplessness: prisoners learned they could not be helped, so gave up
obedience
the following of orders from someone of higher authority
Milgram's study of obedience to authority - aim
the pts thought that the study was about the effects of punishment on memory, the real aim was to see if pts would obey the orders of an authority figure even when there were fatal consequences
Milgram's study of obedience to authority - procedure
40 males (20-50 years) where chosen from the volunteers, paid $4 for simply turning up
experimenter explains that 1 pts will be a 'teacher' + one a 'learner'
naive pts were ALWAYS the 'teacher', confederate ALWAYS the 'learner'
'teacher' read out word Paris from a list
'learner' must say the word that matches one read out loud
if the wrong answer is said the 'learner' receives a shock (15-450v)
Milgram's study of obedience to authority - findings
pts looked uncomfortable, they became sweating, showed nervous laughter, had seizures and said they wanted to leave
100% (40/40 pts) game 300 volts
at 315 volts 4 pts refused to continue
65% (26/40 pts) reached the max 450 volts
Milgram's study of obedience to authority - conclusion
milligram concluded that pts believed any negative consequence of their behaviour can be blamed on someone else, people are less likely to take moral responsibility for their actions
situation variables affecting obedience - loss of uniform (or legitimacy)
when the experimenter appeared to be an ordinary member of society instead of wearing a white lab coat, obedience dropped to 20%
when the experimenter left the room and gave instructions by telephone, only 21% continued to max 450 volts
agentic state
when an individual gives up their free will + acts as an 'agent' implementing an authority figure's decision - the responsibility for their actions is passed onto the person giving orders
autonomous state
when we are aware of our consequences + responsibility, we act/think as an independent individual, we accept personal responsibility for for our actions
diffused responsibility
when someone is in an agent state the person may feel less personal responsibility because they assume others will take action, and they believe others will intervene if required
moral strain
when someone is in an agent state the person may feel uncomfortable/distressed as a consequence of going against your own conscience
how do individuals cope with moral strain?
repression: a type of psychological defence mechanism that involves keeping certain thoughts, feelings or urges out of conscious awareness