information hub - receives and sends signals from the brain
Cortex
Very thin
thinking and processing
4 areas in each hemisphere
roles of nature and nurture
smoking - can lead to smaller brains of baby
infections - in the womb measles can lead to hearing loss
voices - babies learn to recognise the mothers voice
nature - inherited
nurture - environmental influences
Piaget's theory
theory
stages
schemas
Assimilation
Accommodation
schema = mental structure that contain knowledge, they become more complex through assimilation and accommodation
assimilation - adding new info to existing schema
accommodation - receiving new info that changes our understanding so a new schema is formed
strengths for Piaget's theory
research evidence - many studies have been conducted to test Piaget's theory and has helped improve the understanding of children's thinking
real-world application - this theory has changed class room teaching to make it more activity based
weaknesses for Piaget's theory
the sample used middle class Swiss children so the theory may not be universal
Conservation = the ability to realise that the quantity remains even though the appearance of the object/objects has changed (different glasses, tall small)
who conducted the naughty teddy study?
McGarrigle and Donaldson
naughty teddy study aimed to see if the change in the row of counters would help younger children conserve
what was the method of the naughty teddy study ?
80 children, 4-6 years old form Scotland
introduced to 2 rows of counters of different colours
naughty teddy would push some counters into the other line so one looked greater than the other
the researcher would ask them 'is there more in row A or B?'
results for the naughty teddy study
33/80 gave the correct answer when the change was deliberate
54/80 gave correct answer when change was accidental
conclusion for the naughty teddy study
this study shows that traditional ways to test conservation underestimated children's abilities
However there is a difference between the age in children where primary did better overall
strengths to the naughty teddy study
it challenges Piaget's theory, and that his method or questions could have confused the children, this helps refine his theory
weaknesses of the naughty teddy study
the sample was from one school in Scotland which makes it lack validity
children may conserve because they might not have noticed a change since they were distracted by the teddy