Ps produced using random technique e.g. numbers in hat or random number generator (pseudorandom technique)
Random sample strength 1
unbiased - all members have equal chance of selection. But research may end up biased - not all Ps will agree to participate.
RS strength 2
Possible to choose specific subgroup in target pop first - easier to randomly select Ps
RS weakness 1
takes more time and effort than other techniques because need to obtain list of members of target pop then identify sample then contact people and ask to take part.
RS weakness 2
random samples often not random - not all Ps can be accessed or agree so it's more like volunteer
Stratified sample def
Ps selected from dif subgroups (strata) in target pop. Subgroups such as age groups are identified and represented as % of whole pop. e.g. 30% are 12 year olds so 30% in study should be 12. Random selection to identify.
SS strength 1
Most representative of all - subgroups are represented in proportion to numbers in target pop.
SS strength 2
Specific subgroups can be chosen according to the variables considered important by researcher - increases control over possible extraneous variables.
SS weakness 1
which subgroup to use may be biased thus reducing representativeness
SS weakness 2
lengthy process and Ps may not take part so technique not used much in psych research - more for opinion polls
Volunteer sample def
sample of Ps produced by asking people to take part eg ad in newspaper
Volunteer sample strength 1
convenient way to find willing Ps for time consuming studies - volunteers less likely to drop out
VS strength 2
specialised group of Ps (purposive sampling) e.g to study behaviour of med students put ad in med school not mall
VS weakness 1
biased as volunteers more likely highly motivated w more time than general pop (volunteer bias)
VS weakness 2
Volunteers more willing to be helpful so more prone to guessing aim of study and responding to 'demand characteristics'
Opportunity Sample def
sample produced by Ps most easily available at time of study e.g ask people walking by on street
OS strength 1
most convenient,little prep - less time to locate sample
Os strength 2
only technique available maybe. if whole target pop can't be listed
OS weakness 1
inevitably biased - sample drawn from specific part of target pop and not representative. e.g shoppers in mall on Monday morn are small part of pop and largely not people at work
OS weakness 2
Ps may refuse to take part so final sample has weaknesses of volunteer sample - more likely to respond to demand characteristics