Sampling techniques

Cards (20)

  • Random sample def
    Ps produced using random technique e.g. numbers in hat or random number generator (pseudorandom technique)
  • Random sample strength 1
    unbiased - all members have equal chance of selection. But research may end up biased - not all Ps will agree to participate.
  • RS strength 2
    Possible to choose specific subgroup in target pop first - easier to randomly select Ps
  • RS weakness 1
    takes more time and effort than other techniques because need to obtain list of members of target pop then identify sample then contact people and ask to take part.
  • RS weakness 2
    random samples often not random - not all Ps can be accessed or agree so it's more like volunteer
  • Stratified sample def
    Ps selected from dif subgroups (strata) in target pop. Subgroups such as age groups are identified and represented as % of whole pop. e.g. 30% are 12 year olds so 30% in study should be 12. Random selection to identify.
  • SS strength 1
    Most representative of all - subgroups are represented in proportion to numbers in target pop.
  • SS strength 2
    Specific subgroups can be chosen according to the variables considered important by researcher - increases control over possible extraneous variables.
  • SS weakness 1
    which subgroup to use may be biased thus reducing representativeness
  • SS weakness 2
    lengthy process and Ps may not take part so technique not used much in psych research - more for opinion polls
  • Volunteer sample def
    sample of Ps produced by asking people to take part eg ad in newspaper
  • Volunteer sample strength 1
    convenient way to find willing Ps for time consuming studies - volunteers less likely to drop out
  • VS strength 2
    specialised group of Ps (purposive sampling) e.g to study behaviour of med students put ad in med school not mall
  • VS weakness 1
    biased as volunteers more likely highly motivated w more time than general pop (volunteer bias)
  • VS weakness 2
    Volunteers more willing to be helpful so more prone to guessing aim of study and responding to 'demand characteristics'
  • Opportunity Sample def
    sample produced by Ps most easily available at time of study e.g ask people walking by on street
  • OS strength 1
    most convenient, little prep - less time to locate sample
  • Os strength 2
    only technique available maybe. if whole target pop can't be listed
  • OS weakness 1
    inevitably biased - sample drawn from specific part of target pop and not representative. e.g shoppers in mall on Monday morn are small part of pop and largely not people at work
  • OS weakness 2
    Ps may refuse to take part so final sample has weaknesses of volunteer sample - more likely to respond to demand characteristics