Investment model developed SET and suggests that commitment depends on satisfaction level , CLalt + investment size
Commitment to a relationship depends on :
Satisfaction level = extent of rewards outweighing costs
Comparison level with alternatives = judgement if different relationship would increase satisfaction levels
Investment size = resources associated with a romantic relationship
Formula : commitment = satisfaction - alternatives + investment
Commitment strengthened by Satisfaction + Investment
Commitment is weakened by Presence of alternatives
Two types of investment :
Intrinsic : resources put directly in relationship E.g: money ,SD
Extrinsic : resources outside relationship that become strongly connected e.g memories , friends
Relationship maintenance mechanisms
Used to keep relationship going :
Accomodation = promoting relationship
Willingness to sacrifice = putting partners interest 1st
Forgiveness
Positive illusions = be unrealistically pos abt partner
Derogation of alts = partner may be neg abt tempting alts
Strength of Rusbults model : P: explains why ppl stay in abusive relationships
E: Rusbult found that women who reported making the greatest investment + has the fewest attractive alternatives were more likely to return to abusive partner
E: Model can be applied to a wide range of relationships
L: SET + Equity Theory fail to explain
Strength of rusbults model : research support
Satisfaction, comparison with alternatives + investment greatly contributed to commitment.
E: Results true for men + women in either hetero/homosexual relationships
Increases the reliability + validity of the model - factors are universally important
Limitation of Rusbults model : P: oversimplifies investment
E: Goodfriend argue theres more to investment than resources already put in , e.g plans for the future
E: partners will be committed to staying in relationships as they want to see these plans become a reality
L: Investment in romantic relationships is a complex phenomenon as consists of many different factors =model reductionist