political, personal, social group, instrumental, influential, power in discourse, power behind discourse, ideology
power asymmetry
a marked difference in the power status of individuals involved in discourse
unequal encounter
an alternative term for asymetric highlighting the power one speaker has over the other
powerfulparticipant
a speaker with a higher status in a given context, who is therefore able to impose a degree of power
less powerful participants
those with less status in a given context, who is therefore unable to impose a degree of power
constraints
ways in which powerful participants may block or control the contributions of less powerful participants
irving goffman- face theory/face work
-we present a particular image of ourselves to others.
-conversatation is co operative- we accept the face that other people present to us.
-we may reject saying people are being insincere.
-saying something to reject someones 'face' is a 'face threatening act'
-purpose of face work is to maintain 'status' either in conversation or society.
examples of politeness
appropriate terms of address
appropriate speech according to your social relationship with them
degree of formality
turn taking
Browne and Levinson - politeness theory
-works on the assumption that we have two different types of face: positive and negative face
-B&L suggest when we are rude to people we commit face threatening acts (directed at the person we are speaking to)
-when we admit and apologise for our actions we commit face threatening acts (directed at ourselves)
positive face
an individuals desire to be liked and appreciated by others. a persons self esteem.
negative face
an individuals desire to protect their personal rights. freedom of speech and action
positive politeness
appealing to a persons positive face can mean making the individual feel good about themselves
negativepoliteness
appealing to a persons negative face can mean making the other person feel like they havent been imposed on or taken advantage of
John Swales
-discourse communities applies to language and occupation as people share a set of common goals
internal communication- may differ in a discourse community than in social lives
-use specialist lexis and discourse- specific ways of communication due to occupation
-discourse communities require a level of knowledge
Kurt Lewin - gatekeeper
decides what information should be communicated to a group or individual and which info should not
hornyak
-found a pattern that shift in conversation is always initiated by the highest ranking in the room.
herbert and straight
-found a link between compliments and authority
-people of higher authority were more likely to compliment those of lower authority than the other way round. used as a form of praise in workplace
-if used the other way lower ranking person may be seen as condescending
drew and heritage - institutional talk
-members of discourse community share inferential frameworks such as implicit ways of thinking, communicating and behaving.
-they express significance of connecting with others as an important dimension in workplace communications.
drew and heritage
implicit was of thinking, communicating and behaving
CEO of company- communicate in a formal manner, range of genres- email and meetings
employees- more likely to converge if communicating with CEO/boss. more likely to respond with emails than send. wont manage topics in meetings, may speak more or less depending on context
drew and heritage
differences between everyday conversation and workplace talk:
goal orientation, turn-taking,allowable contributions, professional lexis, structure, asymmetry
morreall
workplace humour benefited employment relationships by increasing job satisfaction, creativity and even productivity
koester
phatic talk is communication that helps to build relationships eg talking about the weather, sharing a joke or traffic otw to work - koester said after a study in 2004 that phatic talk is important in the workplace for getting jobs done
koester suggests being sociable and using banter within an occupational group is key to creating a positive and productive work environment.
wenger
wenger defines a community of practice as 'a group of learners who are in the process of learning about the same thing'
3 main characteristics within a community of practice- domain; topic or subject of interest, community: shared activities, discussions and interactions members may have, practice: shared tools and strategies, ideas and results of the interactions of the community
eakins & eakins
in 7 uni faculty meetings the men spoke for longer. mens turns ranged from 10.66s to 17.07s whereas womens ranged from 3-10s
edelsky
uni department meetings- men took more and longer turns and did more arguing, joking, directing and soliciting of responses during more structured segments of meetings
during the 'free for all' parts of the meeting women and men spoke equally
holmes and stubbe
'doing power'- coined this term.
this term recognises the ways in which power is demonstrated by superiors in the workplace when carrying out their occupational role