Forensic Psychology

Subdecks (4)

Cards (375)

  • Who proposed the atavistic form as an explanation for offending behavior?
    Lombroso
  • What did Lombroso argue about criminals in relation to non-criminals?

    He argued that criminals are biologically different and have an innate predisposition to behave anti-socially.
  • How did Lombroso describe criminals in terms of human evolution?

    He described them as a more primitive form of human, less civilized than modern humans.
  • What is the term Lombroso used to describe the physical features of criminals?

    Atavistic form
  • What type of data did Lombroso use to support his theory?

    Measurements from almost 4,000 criminals and skulls of nearly 400 dead criminals.
  • What are some examples of atavistic features identified by Lombroso?

    • Heavy brow
    • Large strong jaw
    • Large ears
    • Extra nipples or extra fingers/toes
  • What non-physical trait did Lombroso associate with criminals?

    Insensitivity to pain
  • What criticism did Lombroso's research face regarding scientific rigor?

    He had no control group to compare the features of criminals to.
  • Who conducted a study that compared London convicts to a control group?
    Goring
  • What was Goring's conclusion regarding criminal behavior and physical appearance?
    He concluded that criminal behavior is not linked to physical appearance.
  • What title is Lombroso often credited with in criminology?

    Father of modern criminology
  • How did Lombroso's views differ from earlier perspectives on criminality?

    He used a more scientific explanation rather than attributing criminality to bad spirits or the devil's influence.
  • What has happened to the idea of criminal types since Lombroso's time?

    The idea has become more sophisticated, with concepts like criminal personality and offender profiling emerging.
  • What did Hooton find in his study of male prisoners compared to a control group?

    He found differences in physical characteristics but they were not the same as those identified by Lombroso.
  • What physical characteristics did Hooton identify as associated with criminals?

    Sloping foreheads, protruding ears, and narrow jaws.
  • What limitation is mentioned regarding the determination of causation in atavistic traits?

    Atavistic traits may be common among criminals but do not necessarily cause offending behavior.
  • What factors might influence facial and cranial features according to the text?
    Poverty or poor diet
  • What did Agnew argue regarding interactions and offending behavior?

    Unpleasant interactions due to appearance can increase frustration and anger, leading to offending behavior.
  • What general observation is made about offending behavior in families?

    Offending behavior runs in families.
  • What do twin studies, adoption studies, and family studies help establish regarding criminal behavior?

    They help establish whether there may be genetic transmission of criminal behavior.
  • What did Lange's study involve?

    13 pairs of identical twins and 17 pairs of non-identical twins.
  • What was Lange's conclusion regarding the twins in his study?

    30% of MZ twins had a co-twin who was also in prison, compared to 6% of DZ twins.
  • What did Crowe find regarding adopted children and criminal records?

    Adopted children with a biological parent who had a criminal record had a 50% risk of having a criminal record by age 18.
  • What was the risk of criminal records for adopted children without a biological parent with a criminal record?

    5% risk
  • What did Farrington's study reveal about convicted parents and their children?

    About 75% of convicted fathers and mothers had a convicted child.
  • What abnormalities did Tiihonen et al. reveal in their study related to violent crime?

    Abnormalities in the MAOA and CHD13 genes.
  • What was the increased likelihood of violent behavior associated with the high-risk gene combination found by Tiihonen et al.?

    Individuals were 13 times more likely to have a history of violent behavior.
  • What limitation is mentioned regarding the effect of environment in genetic studies?

    The twins and families likely share the same environment.
  • What is suggested about MZ twins and environmental effects?

    MZ twins are treated similarly due to their appearance, increasing environmental effects.
  • What does the diathesis-stress model suggest about genetics and offending behavior?

    Genetics may predispose individuals to criminal behavior, moderated by environmental effects.
  • What did Mednick's study reveal about convictions in Danish adoptees?

    The rate of convictions increased with the criminal history of biological and adoptive parents.
  • What were the conviction rates when neither biological nor adoptive parents had a criminal conviction?

    13.5%
  • What were the conviction rates when either biological or adoptive parents had a conviction?

    20%
  • What were the conviction rates when both biological and adoptive parents had convictions?

    24.5%
  • What did Brunner's case study analyze?

    The X chromosomes of 28 members of a Dutch family with a history of violence.
  • What defect did Brunner find in the violent men of the family he studied?

    A defect on the X chromosome and abnormally low levels of MAOA in their brains.
  • What caution is advised when generalizing from Brunner's case study?

    All men shared the same aggressive environment.
  • What dilemma does the notion of a criminal gene present for the legal system?

    It challenges the assumption of personal and moral responsibility for actions.
  • What do neural explanations refer to in the context of offending behavior?

    They refer to the (dys)function of the brain and nervous system.
  • What percentage of the general US population has had a brain injury?
    1. 5%