Zimbardo

Cards (9)

  • Zimbardo - procedure

    He set up a mock prison in the basement of the Psychology department of Stanford University - referred to as the Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE)
    He advertised for students to volunteer and selected 21 'emotionally stable' students after extensive emotional testing
    They were then randomly assigned prisoner or guard
    The prisoners were arrested outside their homes by local police and taken to the 'prison'
  • Zimbardo - procedure
    The uniforms led to de-individuation:
    Prisoners: loose smock and cap - identified by number not name
    Guards: shirts, mirrored shades and handcuffs
    The prisoners were encouraged to identify with their role through tasks and language, eg: if they wanted to leave they had to 'apply for parole'
    Th guards were reminded that they had complete control over the prison
  • Zimbardo - findings

    He found that the guards conformed to their social roles enthusiastically and treated prisoners harshly
    Prisoners rebelled after 2 days + guards retaliated
    Guards threatened prisoners psychological and physical health
    Study was stopped after 6 days instead of 14
  • Zimbardo - conclusions

    Social roles have had a strong influence on behaviour
    Social roles were easily taken on by all participants
  • Social roles
    Parts people play in their social group and the expectations of what is appropriate behaviour in those roles
  • Strength of the SPE
    Zimbardo had complete control over key variables - for example the selection of participants (emotionally stable)
    The researcher could easily rule out personality differences that could affect findings
    This increased internal validity of the study - more confident in drawing conclusions
  • Strength of SPE
    It explains the behaviour in Abu Ghraib - serious human rights violations by US army against Iraqi prisoners at Abu Ghraib
    Prisoners were tortured, sexually abused and some were murdered
    Results of experiment can be used to explain current events and to strengthen ability to explain human behaviour
  • Limitation of SPE
    There is a lack of realism in the experiment as the participants knew that this was not a real prison
    Participants were play acting rather than genuinely conforming to a role
    Participants' performances may have been based off stereotypes of how prisoners and guards are supposed to behave
    Suggests that the SPE tells us very little about conformity to social roles in actual prisons
  • Limitation of SPE
    It exaggerates the power of roles
    Only 1/3 of guards behaved in a brutal manner
    1/3 tried to apply rules fairly
    The rest tried to help and support prisoners
    Most guards were able to resist situational pressures to conform to a brutal role