Asch's study:

Cards (8)

  • What was Asch's research study?
    Solomon Asch devised a procedure to asses to what extent people will conform to the opinion of others, even in a situation where the answer is certain.
  • Asch's baseline procedure:
    • 123 men were tested, each one in a group with other apparent participants
    • Each participant saw two large white cards on each trial
    • The line X on the left-hand card is the standard line
    • The lines A, B and C are the three comparison lines
    • One of the three comparison lines is always clearly the same length as X, the other two are substantially different
    • On each trial the participants had to say (out loud) which of the comparison lines was the same length as the standard line X.
  • Asch'c baseline procedure continued:
    • The participants were tested in groups of 6 to 8
    • One was a naive participant, always seated either last or next to last in the group
    • The others were all confederates of Asch- that is, they all gave the same (incorrect) scripted answers each time
    • The genuine participant did not know the others were confederates
  • What were Asch's baseline findings?
    • On average the genuine participants agreed with the confederates incorrect answers 36.8% of the time (yielded to the social pressures)
    • There were individual differences, 25% of the participants never gave a wrong answer (confident enough to not conform)
  • Variables investigated by Asch:
    • G-group size
    • U- unanimity
    • T- task difficulty
  • group size:
    • varied the number of confederates from one to 15
    • curvilinear relationship between group size and conformity rate
    • Conformity increased with group size, but only up to a point
    • with three confederates, conformity to the wrong answer rose to 31.8%. But the presence of more confederates made little difference- the conformity rate soon levelled off
    • this suggests that most people are very sensitive to the views of others because just one or two confederates was enough to sway opinion
  • Task Difficulty:
    • Asch increased the difficulty of the line-judging task by making the stimulus line and the comparison lines more similar to each other in length
    • Asch found that conformity increased
    • It may be that the situation is more ambiguous when the task becomes harder- it is unclear to the participants what the right answer is
    • In these circumstances, it is natural to look to other people for guidance and to assume that they are right and you are wrong
  • Unanimity:
    • Asch introduced a confederate who disagreed with the other confederates
    • In one variation of the study this person gave the correct answer and in another variation he gave a (different) wrong one
    • The genuine participant conformed less often in the presence of a dissenter
    • The rate decreased to less than a quarter of the level it was when the majority was unanimous
    • This suggests that the influence of the majority depends to a large extent on it being unanimous
    • And that non-conformity is more likely when cracks are perceived in the majority's unanimous view