Solomon Aschdevised a procedure to asses to what extent people will conform to the opinion of others, even in a situation where the answer is certain.
Asch's baseline procedure:
123 men were tested, each one in a group with other apparent participants
Each participant saw two large white cards on each trial
The line X on the left-hand card is the standard line
The lines A, B and C are the three comparison lines
One of the three comparison lines is always clearly the same length as X, the other two are substantially different
On each trial the participants had to say (out loud) which of the comparison lines was the same length as the standard line X.
Asch'c baseline procedure continued:
The participants were tested in groups of 6 to 8
One was a naive participant, always seated either last or next to last in the group
The others were all confederates of Asch- that is, they all gave the same (incorrect) scripted answers each time
The genuine participant did not know the others were confederates
What were Asch's baseline findings?
On average the genuine participants agreed with the confederates incorrect answers 36.8% of the time (yielded to the social pressures)
There were individual differences, 25% of the participants never gave a wrong answer (confident enough to not conform)
Variables investigated by Asch:
G-group size
U- unanimity
T- task difficulty
group size:
varied the number of confederates from one to 15
curvilinear relationship between group size and conformity rate
Conformity increased with group size, but only up to a point
with three confederates, conformity to the wrong answer rose to 31.8%. But the presence of more confederates made little difference- the conformity rate soon levelled off
this suggests that most people are very sensitive to the views of others because just one or two confederates was enough to sway opinion
Task Difficulty:
Asch increased the difficulty of the line-judging task by making the stimulus line and the comparison lines more similar to each other in length
Asch found that conformity increased
It may be that the situation is more ambiguous when the task becomes harder- it is unclear to the participants what the right answer is
In these circumstances, it is natural to look to other people for guidance and to assume that they are right and you are wrong
Unanimity:
Asch introduced a confederate who disagreed with the other confederates
In one variation of the study this person gave the correct answer and in another variation he gave a (different) wrong one
The genuine participant conformed less often in the presence of a dissenter
The rate decreased to less than a quarter of the level it was when the majority was unanimous
This suggests that the influence of the majority depends to a large extent on it being unanimous
And that non-conformity is more likely when cracks are perceived in the majority's unanimous view