realist = the stance that miracles are seen as real events brought about by God
they are objectively true even though they are not fully understood
miracle as an extraordinary coincidence of a beneficial nature
e.g: explosion at chapel in Nebraska - all 15 members of the choir were uncharacteristically late for practice
this was seen as God at work
however, thousands of explosions take place throughout the world, killing + injuring many - why does God not save them?
miracle as an event brought about by a spiritual power, working through people
Moses delivering the Israelites from slavery
miracle as a violation of natural law
three aspects: (1) it is something that happens when God's intervention interferes with the normal workings of the laws of nature; (2) it is an intentional act of God's will; (3) it has religious significance
miracle as a violation of natural law problems
encourages a 'god of the gaps' approach
today's science does not accept this concept of violation, since its sees the laws of nature as descriptive (based on experience) + probabilistic (showing what's likely to happen)
if the concept of violation is accepted, then is it likely that evidence to support the miracle will outweigh the mass of evidence supporting the natural law that is said to be breached?
if such intervention is an act of God's will, why is there so much suffering?
significance of realist views
according to them, miracles such as Jesus healing the paralysed man are objectively true
this strengthens the faith of Christians
many Christians see miracles as a demonstration of God's power + love