Hume's thoughts are based on empiricism: human knowledge is derived from sense experience
we cannot know if an event was due to a deity because any deity is 'hidden' + unobservable
Hume accepted the possibility of new + extraordinary events, but they are not miraculous
Hume followed the inductive approach:
whereas effects can be verified, causes cannot
everything therefore is about probability, not certainty
Hume adopts a realist standpoint on the term of miracles: he assumes that religious believers' claims are regarded as factual + literally true
a miracle is "a transgression of a law of nature by a particular volition of the Deity"
Hume's argument is based on the consistency of human sense experience
although unusual, it is not a miracle if an apparently healthy man dies suddenly
if a dead man came back to life, that would be a miracle as it runs counter to universal sense experience
3 aspects to Hume's definition of the term 'miracle'
it violates the laws of nature
it is willed by God
it may be performed by some other spiritual agent
Hume's arguments against miracles:
the validity of witness evidence about anything is dependent on evidence
the more unlikely the claim, the more reliable the evidence needs to be
an event that violates the laws of nature is maximally improbable
therefore, the likelihood that the witnesses are lying or mistaken is always greater than the likelihood that a miracle has happened
Hume's supporting arguments against miracles:
there has never been one single miracle supported by witnesses possessing the attributes required for their claims to be taken seriously
people are taken in by claims of miracles because humans are naive in nature
miracle stories are the products of primitive superstitions - they come from "ignorant and barbarous peoples"
the different religions all lay claim to miracles
the significance of Hume's views in relation to religious belief
it is an inductive argument, so can neither definitively prove nor disprove the existence of miracles
it is possible to construct a theistic argument along the lines of Hume's + conclude logically that miracles probably do happen
Hume's 4 arguments supporting his main argument are not particularly strong + can all be challenged with supporting evidence
Hume's concluding statement that Christianity is founded on faith + not reason makes the point: the pre-scientific nature of biblical writing needs to be taken in to account