Offender Profiling Top and Bottom

    Cards (28)

    • What is the main idea behind offender profiling?

      Characteristics of an offender can be deduced from the characteristics of the offence and crime scene.
    • What is the main aim of offender profiling?

      To narrow the field of enquiry and the list of likely suspects.
    • What does compiling a profile usually involve?

      Careful scrutiny of the crime scene and analysis of evidence, including witness reports.
    • What are the two main types of offender profiling?
      Top-down approach and Bottom-up approach.
    • Where did the top-down approach to offender profiling originate?

      In the United States, from the FBI's work in the 1970s.
    • What data did the FBI's Behavioural Science Unit use for the top-down approach?

      Data gathered from in-depth interviews with 36 sexually motivated serial killers.
    • How are murderers or rapists classified in the top-down approach?

      They are classified as either organised or disorganised based on the evidence.
    • What does modus operandi (MO) refer to in the context of offender profiling?

      It refers to the particular way serious offenders have of 'working'.
    • What are the characteristics of organised offenders?

      • Planned the crime in advance
      • Deliberately target victims
      • Maintain high control during the crime
      • Leave little evidence behind
      • Above-average intelligence and skilled occupation
      • Often married with children
    • What are the characteristics of disorganised offenders?

      • Little evidence of planning
      • Impulsive and spontaneous acts
      • Crime scene reflects lack of control
      • Lower than average IQ and often unemployed
      • History of sexual dysfunction and failed relationships
      • Tend to live alone and close to the crime scene
    • What are the four main stages in the construction of an FBI profile?

      1. Crime scene analysis
      2. Evidence collection
      3. Hypothesis generation
      4. Profile construction
    • How does the bottom-up approach differ from the top-down approach?

      It builds a picture of the potential criminal from facts and figures collected from previous crimes.
    • What is investigative psychology?

      It is an approach fine-tuned by David Canter that is grounded in psychological theory.
    • What are the key assumptions of investigative psychology?

      • Interpersonal coherence: offender behavior reflects everyday behavior.
      • Significance of time and place: crime timing and location provide clues.
      • Forensic awareness: previous police interrogation affects behavior.
    • What is smallest space analysis?

      It is a statistical technique that identifies correlations across patterns of behavior.
    • How does geographic profiling assist in offender profiling?

      It helps understand the spatial pattern of an offender's behavior to locate their base.
    • What is Canter's circle theory?

      • Marauder: Offender's home is within the crime area.
      • Commuter: Offender travels to a familiar area to commit crimes.
    • What does the 'jeopardy surface' refer to in geographic profiling?

      It helps investigators make educated guesses about where the offender is likely to strike next.
    • What are the strengths and weaknesses of the top-down approach?

      Strengths:
      • Provides a framework for profiling.
      Weaknesses:
      • Unscientific development.
      • Small, unrepresentative sample.
      • Relies on self-report data.
    • What are the strengths and weaknesses of the bottom-up approach?

      Strengths:
      • Data-driven and scientific.
      • Applicable to a wide range of offenses.
      Weaknesses:
      • Some crimes may be harder to profile.
    • What did Canter and Goodwin (1997) find regarding offenders and their residences?

      They found that 85% of offenders lived within the circle encompassing their offenses.
    • How does the classification of organised and disorganised offenders affect the accuracy of profiling?

      The distinction is too simplistic and may not accurately reflect the complexity of offender behavior.
    • What did Copson (1995) find about the usefulness of offender profiling?

      He found that the advice given in profiles was useful in 83% of cases but only helped catch offenders in 3% of cases.
    • What are the key components to consider when comparing the top-down and bottom-up approaches?

      • Scientific basis
      • Range of applicability
      • Complexity of offender classification
    • What is the role of mental maps in geographic profiling?

      Mental maps are individuals' internal representations of the external world, unique to each person.
    • What is the significance of the spatial decision-making in offender profiling?

      It provides insight into the nature of the offence and factors about the offender.
    • How can the top-down approach be considered limited in its application?

      It is primarily applicable to violent crimes and does not work well for more common offenses like burglary.
    • What is the importance of accurate and detailed records in offender profiling?

      They are crucial for the success of psychological profiles provided to the police.