origins of psychology

Cards (17)

  • what are the features of science?

    replication
    falsifiability
    control
    objectivity
    predictability
  • what is replication?

    findings should be repeated when tested in different occasions
  • what is falsifiability?
    hypotheses and theories must be able to be proven wrong. findings that contradict hypotheses are used to develop new theories
  • what is control?
    tests involve holding variables constant in order to establish cause and effect
  • what is objectivity?

    researchers are unbiased and not influenced by their personal feelings and experiences
  • what is predictability?

    the aim is to be able to predict future behavior from research findings
  • what is science?

    approach to studying the universe/natural world through observation and experimentation
  • what did john locke suggest and when?

    in order to understand humans, we should directly observe and record our experiences
    mid 17th century
  • when did wilhelm wundt perform his experiments?

    1879
  • where was the first lab?
    leipzig uni in germany
  • what was the aim of wundts work?
    to investigate the nature of human consciousness
  • what was structuralism?

    breaking down a persons observations into separate parts
  • what is introspection?
    gaining knowledge about an individuals own mental and emotional states
  • who did wundt test introspection on?

    colleagues & students who he trained to make observations
  • what was the process of wundts procedure?

    •pp’s were presented with carefully controlled stimuli
    •surroundings and instructions are standardised
    •asked to provide a description of inner processes they experienced
  • how did wundts work contribute to psychology?
    •carefully controlled conditions encouraged others eg behavourists to follow the same scientific approach
    •had a large impact on later approaches - cognitive focused on the study of internal mental processes
  • what were the critisms of introspection?
    •lacked scientific rigour - results are subjective and can’t be verified because only observable behaviour can be measured
    •unreliable because often subject reports differed to the same stimulus so couldn’t be replicated