Chp15: Integrity, Objectivity & Independence

    Cards (40)

    • Threats to independence:
      • Self-interest
      • Self-review
      • Advocacy
      • Familiarity
      • Intimidation
      • Management
    • Examples of self-interest threat:
      • Financial interests
      • Close business relationships
      • Gifts & hospitality
      • Loans and guarantees
      • Overdue fees
      • High percentage of fees
      • Lowballing
    • Assurance firm, partners, audit or non-audit staff and immediate family members of such persons are prohibited from having a direct financial interest in the client
    • Financial interest safeguards:
      • Disposing of the interest
      • Removing individual from team
      • Keeping audit committee aware
      • Use engagement quality control reviewer
    • Audit firms and their clients should not have close business relationships e.g. joint venture, combining products, leases between parties
    • Close business relationship safeguards:
      • Should not participate in venture unless immaterial and insignificant
      • No business relationships (unless at arm's length)
      • Should terminate business relationship
    • Gifts and hospitality should not be accepted unless the value of the gift is clearly insignificant in cost and nature
    • Gifts & Hospitality Safeguards:
      • Gift acceptance policy
      • Certain members should not accept gifts
    • Loans and guarantees examples:
      • Immaterial amounts lent are not a threat to independence
      • If loan was material then safeguards needed
    • Loan and guarantees safeguards:
      • Member of engagement should not enter into a loan agreement unless with a bank
      • Independent review of material loan from a lending institution
    • Overdue fees may mean that the assurance provider runs the risk of making a 'loan' to the client
    • Overdue fees safeguard:
      • Payment of overdue fees should be paid before the assurance report is issued
    • High percentage of fees examples:
      • Total audit fees should not be generated from one or few clients
      • Fee should not exceed 10% for a listed company
      • Fee should not exceed 15% for an unlisted company
      • Total non-audit fees must be no more than 70% of the average audit fee from the last 3 years
    • High percentage of fees safeguards:
      • Monitor fee income
      • Discussing breaches with audit committees
      • Disclose breaches to ethics partner
      • Taking steps to reduce the dependency on client
      • Obtain internal/external quality control reviews
      • Consulting a third party (e.g. ICAEW)
      • Resignation is a last resort
    • IFAC (IESBA) code states that if total firm fees exceed 15% for over 2 consecutive years, the firm must:
      • Disclose to those charged with governance
      • Conduct quality control reviews of those years before/after opinion is issued
    • Lowballing examples:
      • When firm charges lower fee than normal
      • Size of fee must not be influenced by the provision of non-audit services to the client
    • Lowballing safeguards:
      • Record that appropriate staff and time spent on client
      • Comply with all applicable assurance standards and quality control procedures
    • Percentage/contingent fee example:
      • Fee based on the outcome of the audit
    • A firm should not enter into any fee arrangement under which the amount of the fee is contingent on the result of the audit work
    • Self-review threat examples:
      • Service with an assurance client
      • Internal audit services
      • Preparing accounts & financial statements
      • Valuation services
      • Tax services
    • Audit firm members who previously provided services to the client should not be assigned to the engagement team (until 2 years following leaving the client)
    • Audit firms cannot provide internal audit services to an audit client (applies to both listed and unlisted companies)
    • Audit firms should not prepare account records for listed clients
    • Preparing records & financial statements safeguards:
      • Using staff members other than assurance team to carry out work
      • Source data for accounting entries to be originated from audit client
      • Underlying assumptions originated and approved by audit client
    • Valuation services safeguards:
      • Second partner review
      • Client understands valuation and assumptions used
      • Client acknowledges responsibility for valuation
      • Use separate personnel for the valuation and the audit
    • Tax services examples:
      • Tax return preparation
      • Tax calculations for accounting entries
      • Tax planning
      • Assistance in dispute resolution
    • Management must take responsibility for tax returns when tax services are provided (safeguard)
    • Separate staff (unlisted companies) to be used for tax calculations for accounting entries but for listed companies this is prohibited if material
    • Tax planning is allowed when supported by previous evidence but is not allowed if subjective and material (safeguard)
    • Assistance in dispute resolution is allowed if separate personnel are used for unlisted companies but not allowed for listed companies if material
    • Advocacy threat safeguards may be using different departments to carry out work and disclosing work to audit committees
    • Familiarity threat examples:
      • Long association with assurance clients
      • Family and personal relationships between client/firm
    • Long association safeguards:
      • Rotate senior staff on audit engagement
      • Engagement partner shall not act for more than 5 years and only can act again after 5 years have elapsed (listed company)
      • Other key partners should not act for a period greater than 7 years
      • If the partner has been involved for 10 years in an unlisted company then the third-party test is applied
    • If there is a family or personal relationship between an audit member and a client member then the individual should not be part of the audit of the client
    • FRCs Ethical Standards include the management threat not ICAEW
    • Management threat - Audit firm undertakes work involving making judgements and taking decisions that are the responsibility of management
    • Others threats considered by audit firm:
      • Illegal activities of the client
      • Apparent dishonesty of the client
      • Questionable accounting practices of the client
    • ICAEW framework for resolving ethical conflicts:
      • Relevant facts
      • Relevant parties
      • Ethical issues involved
      • Relevant fundamental principles
      • Established internal procedures
      • Alternative courses of action
    • Pressures that may be faced by non-practice accountants:
      • Act contrary to law or regulation
      • Act contrary to technical or professional standards
      • Facilitate unethical or illegal earnings
      • Lie or mislead auditors
      • Associated with material misstatements
    • Actions to take when threatened:
      • Resolve internally (if possible) using formal dispute resolution process
      • Obtain advice from ICAEW
      • Seek legal advice
      • Resign (last resort)
    See similar decks