2. A MERE SUPPLY OF INFORMATION
Harvey v Facey (1893)A.C. 552,P.C.
C to D telegram, ‘Will you sell us Bumper Hall Pen? Telegraph lowest cash price’. D replied, ‘Lowest price for BHP £900.’ C sent back, ‘We agree to buy BHP for £900 asked by you. Please send us your title deeds.’
PC (privy council deals with countries in the common wealth then now = supreme court) held: There was no contract. D’s telegram was merely a statement of what the minimum price would be if D eventually decided to sell. It was therefore not an offer which could be accepted by the third telegram.