Memory

Subdecks (2)

Cards (51)

  • Multi store model of memory
    • sensory register
    • short-term memory
    • long-term memory
  • Sensory register
    • sensory specific e.g. different stores for each sense
    • duration: 1/2 second
    • capacity: 7 items at a time
  • Short term memory
    • stores acoustic info
    • Duration: 0-18 seconds
    • Capacity: 7 items at a time
  • Long-term memory
    • Semantic information - can be visual
    • Duration: indefinite amount of time
    • Capacity: unlimited capacity
  • Strength of the multi store model of memory
    • gives a good understanding of short term memory
  • Weakness of multi store model of memory
    • fails to account for how different types of material can result in different depths
  • Types of long term memory
    • procedural memory
    • semantic memory
    • episodic memory
  • Procedural memory
    • responsible for knowing how to do things
    • e.g. how to ride a bike
  • Semantic memory
    • storing information about the world
    • e.g. meaning of words
  • episodic memory
    • storing information about events in our life
    • e.g. our birthday
  • Working memory model
    • central executive
    • episodic buffer
    • phonological loop
    • visuospacial sketchpad
  • Central executive
    • monitors incoming data and divides out limited attention
    • does not store information
  • Episodic buffer
    • temporary store for information
    • links the working memory model to long term memory
  • Phonological loop
    • deals with auditory information
    • Phonological store: stores the words we hear
    • Articulatory process: allows for maintenance rehearsal
  • Visuospacial Sketchpad
    • Stores visual information
    • has a limited capacity
    • Visual cache - stores visual data
    • Innerscribe - records arrangement of objects In the visual field
  • Strengths of working memory model
    • needs to be completed
  • weakness of the working memory model
    • little knowledge about the central executive
    • doesn't explain the link between working memory model and long term memory
  • explanations for forgetting
    • interference - proactive and retroactive
    • retrieval failure - context dependent forgetting and state dependent forgetting
  • interference - proactive interference
    • where old information disrupts new pieces of information
  • interference - retroactive interference
    • where new information disrupts old information
  • retrieval failure - context dependent forgetting
    • recall depends on external cues (e.g. place or weather)
  • retrieval failure - state dependent forgetting
    • recall depends on internal cues
    • such as being sad or feeling drunk
  • interference: strengths
    • occurs in real life situations
    • may explain why its hard to learn a language if one that is similar has already been learnt.
  • interference: limitations
    • low ecological validity
    • temporary
  • Retrieval failure: strengths
    • good real world application
    • high external validity
  • Retrieval failure: limitations
    • may not be applicable to certain situations
  • Cognitive interview
    • reinstatement of context
    • report everything
    • changing perspective
    • recall in reverse order
  • reinstatement of context
    • tries to get witnesses to remember context e.g. asking them about what they were doing during the day
  • Changing perspective
    • remembering information from different points of view
  • Report everything
    • encourages participants to report everything they can remember about the event
  • Recall in reverse order
    • describe the scene in a different chronological order than the normal one
  • Misleading information
    • gives misleading questions to alter answers to suit the researcher.
    • use of demand characteristics
  • Cognitive interview: strengths
    • more structured than standard techniques
    • the more people seem to report, the more in detail when being given the interview technique
  • Cognitive interview: limitations
    • far more time-consuming than a standard interview
    • can be argued that more detailed interview can lead to more mistakes