Save
A Level Law
Tort Law
Rylands v Fletcher
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Share
Learn
Created by
Maddie
Visit profile
Cards (19)
Definition?
persons property is damaged by the escape of non
naturally
stored material
Rylands v Fletcher
created a reservoir and failed to block off
disused mineshafts
water flooded neighbouring mines
Claimant
?
interest in land affected
Defendant
?
interest- owner/
occupier
4
elements
?
bringing onto land
likely to cause mischief
non natural use
of land
thing stored escape and cause
foreseeable damage
Hale
v Jennings Bros
?
Chair o plane broke
likely to do mischief if it escapes-
liable
Rickards v Lothian
unknown person
turned on taps
water in pipe,
natural use of land
Read
v
J Lyons
munitions inspector
,
exploded shell
thing
stored
must escape
Cambridge v Eastern Counties Leather
chemicals seeped into soil
damage not
reasonably foreseeable
Fire?
won't work anymore fire
escaped
not actual material
LMS International
v
Styrene Packaging
Factory contained
flammable
material, fire broke and spread
case for when fire could be used
Stannard v Gore
tyre business, flammable so fire spread more
no liability- thing didn't escape, natural use of land
Defences
?
act of god
, act of stranger, consent,
contributory negligence
, statutory authority
Consent
?
aware of risk, free choice, acting voluntary
consent cases
?
Smith v Baker
Ogwu v Taylor
Perry v Kendrick
transport
stranger removed
petrol cap
no liability
Nichols v Marsland
3
artificial lakes
, freak storms caused banks to
break
no liability
Contributory negligence
?
Stinton
v stinton
Sayes
v Harlow
Remedies
?
most likely damages depending on level of damage