Cards (14)

    • sensorimotor 0-2
      Infants schema consists only of innate reflexes
      egocentric- only see the world from their own pov
      object permanence- object dont exists is they cant see it
    • Research for 1st stage
      Tested object permanence by hiding objects under a cover
      Infants up to 5 mo didn’t search for the object - doesnt exist to them
      same children at 8 mo did search for hidden object
    • eval of 1st stage
      bower- children between 1-4 months did search fro hidden object when lights were turned off
      infants as young as 1 mo showed surprise (how do you measure) when a toy was placed behind a screen it wasn’t there when removed- shows understanding of OP as they knew the toy was behind the screen (VOE)
    • pre operational stage 2-7
      still egocentric
      class inclusion- have not developed ad understanding that an object may be a sub set of a larger class eg. Cats, animals- cats= sub set of animals

      shown a set of mostly brown beads with some white beads, asked if there are more brown beads or more beads- said more brown beads

      centration- only able to focus on one object or situ at one time
    • Eval of 2nd stage
      Mcgarrisoned- looked at lang uses effect on children’s answering -
      35 six yr olds show 3 black cows and 1 white.
      Cows placed on their sides
      1. Are there more black cows or more cows
      2. Are there more black cows or more sleeping cows
      25% answered 1st correctly, 48% for 2nd Q. Shows understanding of class inclusion when asked correctly
    • the three mountains experiment
      aim: determine the children’s ability to take the visual perspective of another person
      procedure: 100 children (4-12) shown model of 3 mountains and 3 coloured cards matching the mountains. asked to arrange the cards to show what could be seen from a different position. in addition tuneup were asked to select a pic which best showed a dolls view when in different positions
      findings: children under 8 were unable to distinguish between their pov and another persons
    • opposition to mountains
      2 intersecting walls, a doll of a girl and 2 dolls of policemen
      30 children (3-5) asked to hid the girl froom police in many configurations
      90% of the time the right spot was selected - Piaget underestimated children
    • conservation
      aim: looking at how centration prevents those in pre op stage‘s understanding of conservation
      procedure: children under7 shown 2 identical glasses with same amount of juice
      -asked to confirm they had the same amount
      -juice from one poured into tall glass
      -asked if the tall glass had more or the same amount
      findings: children said more liquid in tall glass as it is higher
    • Concrete operations stage 7-11
      No longer display egocentrism or centration, can recognise that numbers, mass and weights stay then same dispute appearance
      Can mentally reverse the pouring which allows them to recognise it has the same amount of liquid
      Better at concrete tasks rather than abstract tasks
    • formal operations stage (12->) 

      can logically reason without concrete tasks
      series of deductive reasoning tasks (is A>B>C then A>C) found all cases the child could solve the problems
    • Evaluation
      Strengths:
      First person to investigate how children’s thinking changes over Development
      Teaching methods have been developed as a result of his work
      Limitations:
      More descriptive than explanatory
      Stages can overlap so it is better to say it is a continuous process
      Ignored other factors which may have caused failure in tasks other than lack of necessary cog functions
    • motivation to learn - equalibration + disequalibration
      When we have encountered new info and have built it into our understanding of a topic by either assimilating into an existing schema to forming a new one- accommodating. It means everything is balanced and we have escaped disequalibration
    • how we learn- assimilation
      when we acquire new information that doesnt radically change our understanding of a topic so we incorporate it into an existing schema
    • how we learn- accommodation
      when we acquire new information that changes our understanding of a topic to the extent that we need to form one or more new schemas