subjecting a piece of research to independent scrutiny by other psychologists working in the field
they consider the research in terms of; validity, significance and originality
these experts should be objective and known to the researcher
aims of peer review
. high validity and reliability
. retain integrity of psychologists
. provide recommendations abt whether the research should be published to the public or not
. judge significance of the research in wider context of human behaviour
Advantages of peer review
✅ protects quality of published research- minimizes fraudulent research so what is published is high quality- preserves the psychologists reputation and increases the credibility
Disadvantage of peer review
❌anonymity used to criticize rival research- some ppl use this when criticizing their rivals research. This causes competition for fundings of competitive research
❌publication bias- when publishers want to publish “headline-grabbing” findings
❌ground breaking research may be buried- reviewers will be more critical of research that contradicts their own. Slowing the rate of change in science
Why do we peer review
. Prevents dissemination of unwanted claims and deliberate fraud- improves research quality
. Ensures published research is taken seriously
. Increases probability of weaknesses or errors- researchers are less objective about their own work
Eg. ques= explain why conducting a peer review might improve psychological research
. High quality which suggested improvements
. Ensures quality data analysis
. Research appropriate for publication
. Research is credible and maintains the researcher’s reputation
The most common way psychological research is published