Has methodological Issues - participant may have worked out the aims as it's a lab experiment, leading to a lack of internal validity as it doesn't accurately measure obedience. However, as it's a lab experiment it is replicable, therefore can be measures for reliability
Can be deemed socially sensitive - suggests the Nazi's obeyed Hitler due to the environment. This means responsibility is decreased and psychology is guilty of providing excuses for the Nazi's war crimes
One strength of situational variables?
obedience is supported by research by Bickman
He found most people obeyed authority (76%), 45% obeyed a milkman and the least amount of people obeyed a civilian (30%)
This suggests uniform makes people obey more - they're seen as more authoritative
The implication is that the idea that situational variables affects obedience is valid as the findings of the study verify the predictions it makes (environment effects obedience)
What were the variations in the proximity experiment (Miligram)?
Proximity - teachers and learners were in the same room, obedience dropped to 40% due to guilt
Touch proximity - teacher forced the learners to put hand onto an electrical shock plate if learners refused to do it themselves, obedience dropped to 30% due to an increase in responsibility
Remote - experimenter gave instructions over a telephone call, obedience dropped to 20% due to less pressure
What were the location variations in Milligram's study?
original experiment took place at Yale
A variation took place in a run down office
Obedience dropped to 47.5% as it seemed less authoritative and legitimate
What were the uniform variations in Miligram's study?
The experimenter wore a white lab coat originally
In a variation, the experimenter wore normal clothes
Obedience dropped to 20% due to feeling like the experimenter had less authority towards them (the participant)