information received after an event can cause retroactive interference
aim of Loftus and Palmersfirst experiment?
to investigate how changing a verb would affect recall of a road traffic accident
explain the procedure of Loftus and Palmers first experiment?
45 participants watched films of varying length of a traffic accident. after each film participants were given a questionnaire. there was a critical question about the speed with a varying verbs; hit, smashed, collided, bumped and contacted
findings of Loftus and Palmersfirst experiment?
smashed= 40.5 mph
contacted= 31.8
the more aggressive verb caused a higher mean estimate
conclusion of Loftus and Palmers first experiment?
leading questions have an impact on recall
what was the aim of Loftus and Palmerssecond experiment?
to investigate how different verbs affected recall of seeing broken glass
procedure of Loftus and Palmerssecondexperiment?
150 participants watched a film of a traffic accident. there were 3 groups- one was asked at what speed the cars smashed, one was asked with the word hit and the other didn’t have a question about speed. a week later they were asked if they saw broken glass
findings of Loftus and Palmerssecond experiment?
smashed= 16 saw broken glass
hit= 7
control= 6
the use of a more aggressive verb made people believe they saw broken glass
conclusions of Loftus and Palmers second experiment?
critical words influence a persons response, a persons schema for the word influences their memory, memory alters so people actually believe the changes