Carl Rogers argued that for personal growth to be achieved an individuals concept of self must be broadly equivalent to, or have congruence, with the ideal self
self- the ideas and values that characterise ‘i’ and ‘me’ and includes perception and valuing of ‘what I am’ and ‘what I can do’
Congruence- when the self- concept and ideal self are broadly accord or match
Ideal self- the person they want to be
If too big a gap exists between the two ‘selves’ the person will experience a state of incongruence and self-actualisation will not be possible due to the negative feelings of self- worth that arise from incongruence
Conditions of worth- when a parent places limits or boundaries on their love of their children.
Conditions we believe we have to meet to gain acceptance, love or positive regard from others
In order to reduce the gap between the self concept and the ideal selfRogers develop client centred therapy to help people cope with the problems of every day living
Rogers claimed that many of the issues we experience as adults such as worthlessness and low self-esteem have their roots in childhood and can often be explained by lack of unconditional positive regard
A parent who sets boundaries or limits on the love for their child is storing up psychological problems for that child in the future
Roger saw one of his roles as an effective therapist as being able to provide his clients with the unconditional positive regard that they had failed to receive as children