Minority Influence

    Cards (29)

    • What are the three main processes in minority influence?
      Consistency, Commitment, Flexibility
    • What is the definition of consistency in minority influence?
      • Minority must consistently repeat the same beliefs or messages.
      • Essential for success in influencing the majority.
    • What is synchronic consistency?
      All members of the minority say the same thing.
    • Provide an example of synchronic consistency.
      Suffragettes all wanted women to have the vote.
    • What is diachronic consistency?
      Over time, the minority maintains the same stance.
    • Provide an example of diachronic consistency.
      Suffragettes repeatedly campaigned for years.
    • What is the effect of consistency in minority influence?
      It draws attention to the minority’s viewpoint and may lead to internalisation.
    • What thoughts might arise due to the effect of consistency?
      “They’ve kept saying this for so long, they might be right.”
    • What was the procedure in Moscovici et al.'s (1969) study on consistency?
      • Groups of six viewed blue-coloured slides.
      • Two participants were confederates (minority).
      • Conditions:
      • Consistent: Confederates called blue slides green.
      • Inconsistent: Confederates called slides green 24 times and blue 12 times.
      • Control: No confederates present.
    • What were the findings of the consistent condition in Moscovici et al.'s study?
      Participants called the slides green in 8.42% of trials.
    • What percentage of participants in the consistent condition called the slides green at least once?
      32% of participants called the slides green at least once.
    • What were the findings of the inconsistent condition in Moscovici et al.'s study?
      Participants called the slides green in only 1.25% of trials.
    • What was the control group's response in Moscovici et al.'s study?
      Participants rarely called the slides green.
    • What did Wood et al. (1994) find in their meta-analysis on minority influence?
      • Consistent minorities were the most influential.
      • Conclusion: Consistency is critical in influencing the majority.
    • What is a potential drawback of over-consistency in minority influence?
      It can be perceived as inflexible, causing the majority to ignore the minority view.
    • What is the definition of commitment in minority influence?
      • Minorities demonstrate commitment by engaging in extreme activities.
      • Shows dedication to their cause.
    • What is the effect of commitment in minority influence?
      It shows dedication and creates the augmentation principle.
    • Provide an example of how suffragettes demonstrated commitment.
      Suffragettes used hunger strikes, force-feeding, and imprisonment.
    • What was the study conducted by Xie et al. (2011) about commitment?
      • Participants communicated on social networks.
      • Minority with strong commitment influenced others to adopt their view.
      • Conclusion: Commitment significantly impacts the adoption of new viewpoints by the majority.
    • What is a weakness of commitment in minority influence?
      Minority may be seen as deviants or troublemakers, leading the majority to avoid them.
    • What is the definition of flexibility in minority influence?
      • Minority must demonstrate flexibility while maintaining consistency.
      • A balance is necessary to avoid being off-putting.
    • What is the effect of flexibility in minority influence?
      A rigid approach may be off-putting; flexibility helps in appearing reasonable.
    • What was the procedure in Nemeth and Brilmayer's (1987) study on flexibility?
      • In a mock jury, group members discussed compensation for a ski-lift accident.
      • Confederate argued for a different viewpoint but initially refused to change.
      • When the confederate showed flexibility, he influenced the group.
    • What were the findings regarding inflexible positions in Nemeth and Brilmayer's study?
      Inflexible position led to no influence on the group.
    • What were the findings regarding flexible positions in Nemeth and Brilmayer's study?
      Flexible position led to influence on group opinion.
    • What is the process of minority influence leading to internalisation?
      • Minority influence leads to internalisation.
      • Both public and private views change as the majority scrutinises the minority’s perspective.
      • Results in more permanent change.
    • What is a real-world example of minority influence?
      • Suffragette movement.
      • Their persistence led to changes in public attitudes towards women’s voting rights.
    • What role does identification play in minority influence?
      • Identification with the minority is crucial for change.
      • Example: Straight majority influenced more by a straight minority advocating for gay rights.
    • What did Maass et al. (1982) conclude about identification in minority influence?
      Without identification with the minority, change is less likely, regardless of consistency, commitment, or flexibility.