conducted a study from a feminist perspective on female offenders
Her study focused on a group of mostly working-class women aged 15 to 46.
All participants had been convicted of one or more crimes.
Carlen used in-depth, unstructuredinterviews for data collection.
Some of the women interviewed were in prison or youth custody during the study.
Carlen's approach is based on control theory.
The theory assumes that humans are neither inherently good nor bad.
People make rational decisions to commit crimes when they perceive the advantages to outweigh the disadvantages.
Her view
Carlen argues that working-class women are controlled by the promise of rewards
They enter a class deal: respectable working-class women receive consumer goods in exchange for their wages
They have to maintain employment and stay within societal expectations of respectable behaviour
They also enter a gender deal: women receive psychological and material rewards from male breadwinners in return for love and domestic labor (gender roles)
Examples; love, financial stability, or a sense of belonging
UNAVAILBLE REWARDS
When promised rewards are unavailable or seem illusory, criminality can become a viable alternative.
Carlen’s study, though based on a small sample (39 women), supports this view.
Findings suggest that criminal behavior is more likely when socialcontrol mechanisms break down
THEREFORE provides support for the controltheory
When deals" fail or when the rewards don’t materialize e.g when a woman is unemployed, underpaid, or abandoned by a partner CRIME is committed
Criticism of sample
small sample
sample may be unrepresentative of all crimes committed by women
Strength of her research method
Unstructured interviews
Flexible
Carlen could have tailored the questions to each women to produce in depth and detailed data
Weakness of her research method
Hard to analyse
Data cannot be compared as all the questions differ