CARLEN- FEMINIST

Cards (7)

  • Carlen
    • conducted a study from a feminist perspective on female offenders
    • Her study focused on a group of mostly working-class women aged 15 to 46.
    • All participants had been convicted of one or more crimes.
    • Carlen used in-depth, unstructured interviews for data collection.
    • Some of the women interviewed were in prison or youth custody during the study.
    • Carlen's approach is based on control theory.
    • The theory assumes that humans are neither inherently good nor bad.
    • People make rational decisions to commit crimes when they perceive the advantages to outweigh the disadvantages.
  • Her view
    • Carlen argues that working-class women are controlled by the promise of rewards
    • They enter a class deal: respectable working-class women receive consumer goods in exchange for their wages
    • They have to maintain employment and stay within societal expectations of respectable behaviour
    • They also enter a gender deal: women receive psychological and material rewards from male breadwinners in return for love and domestic labor (gender roles)
    • Examples; love, financial stability, or a sense of belonging
  • UNAVAILBLE REWARDS
    • When promised rewards are unavailable or seem illusory, criminality can become a viable alternative.
    • Carlen’s study, though based on a small sample (39 women), supports this view.
    • Findings suggest that criminal behavior is more likely when social control mechanisms break down
    • THEREFORE provides support for the control theory
    • When deals" fail or when the rewards don’t materialize e.g when a woman is unemployed, underpaid, or abandoned by a partner CRIME is committed
  • Criticism of sample
    • small sample
    • sample may be unrepresentative of all crimes committed by women
  • Strength of her research method
    • Unstructured interviews
    • Flexible
    • Carlen could have tailored the questions to each women to produce in depth and detailed data
  • Weakness of her research method
    • Hard to analyse
    • Data cannot be compared as all the questions differ