Humanistic Approach

    Cards (13)

    • Humanistic Psychology
      • Abraham Maslow and Carl Rogers = founding fathers
      • Focused on discovering what it means to be human
      • Argue that other approaches are reductionist and deterministic - more complex
      • Conscious experience
    • Free Will
      • Every individual can assert free will
      • Have a choice in behaviour
      • Conscious control over destiny even with outside forces
      • Still subject to biological and societal influences but can make significant personal choices 
    • Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs
      • Maslow - often individuals “work-up”, but not always the case
      • E.g need self-esteem before finding love
      • Finding out what could go right
      • Importance of growth and fulfilment 
      • More basic the need, the more powerfully it is experienced and more difficult to ignore
    • Self-Actualisation
      • Rare
      • Possibility of true self-awareness and an honest relationship with the realities of an imperfect world
      • Takes form of peak experiences
      • Euphoria
      • Seeing world with awe and wonder
      • No fear or inhibitions
      • Trend in people: 
      • Accurate perception of world
      • Creative
      • Accepting of other people
    • Focus on the Self
      • Rogers interested in need for self-worth and need for unconditional positive regard
      • Emerge from good relationships with supportive parents
      • Friends and spouse later in life
      • Direct impact on well-being
      • Closer self-concept and ideal safe = greater self-worth and greater psychological health
    • Role of Conditions of Worth
      • Unconditional positive regard = conditions of worth
      • Conditions of worth (have to behave in certain ways) = receive positive regard
      • Type of expectation
      • Self-acceptance = meeting conditions of worth
      • Produce feeling of incongruence
    • Congruence
      • Unhappiness and dissatisfaction are outcomes of gap between self-concept and ideal self
      • Concepts incongruent = use defence mechanisms (no negative feelings)
    • Counselling Psychology
      • Psychological problems = result of conditions of worth and conditional positive regard
      • Rogerian therapy - close gap between self-concept and ideal self
      • Allow individual to recognise psychological limits and strengths (find realistic balance)
      • Client-centred approach
      • Deeper understanding of themselves
      • Reach self-actualisation
      • Therapist = provide unconditional positive regard
      • Acceptance, empathy and understanding
      • Conditions of worth will dissipate, move towards ideal self - how they want to behave, now how they feel they should
    • Evaluation Point 1: Strength: Not Reductionist
      Not reductionist
      Rejects attempts to break up behaviour
      E.g Behaviourists + Stimulus-Response Units
      Subjective human experience only through considering whole person
      Holistic
      Meaningful behaviour within real world context
    • Evaluation Point 1: Counter
      Counter: less scientific
      Relatively few concepts that can be measured 
      Cannot be broken down to single variables - e.g can’t measure self-actualisation
      Short on empirical evidence
    • Evaluation Point 2: Weakness: Culture
      Cultural bias
      Individual freedom, autonomy, personal growth = individualist cultures
      Collectivist Cultures = group needs + interdependence 
      Self - actualisation not as important for them
      Do not identify with values and ideal
      Not universal
    • Evaluation Point 3: Strength: Optimistic
      Optimistic
      Praised for bringing the person back into psychology
      Positive image of human condition 
      Good, free to work towards potential
      Refreshing and optimistic
    • Evaluation Point 3: Counter: Unrealistic
      Counter: unrealistic view of human nature.
      More sinister aspects of human behaviour 
      Focuses on ‘growth-orientated’ behaviour whilst ignoring an individual’s capacity for self-destruction.
      Overlooks possible situational forces that may provide a more realistic explanation of everyday human behaviour.
    See similar decks