free will defence - humans have been given free will by god so they are responsible for their actions
theodicy - attempts to reconcile the existence of evil with belief in god's goodness and omnipotence
the problem of evil is the question of how an all-powerful, benevolent God can allow suffering to exist
compatibilistview - free will exists because we have control over our choices but these choices are determined by factors such as genetics or past experiences
problem of evil - if an all-powerful, benevolent god exists then why is there suffering in the world
incompatibilists believe that if everything is predetermined then there is no freedom of choice
logical problem of evil - it seems illogical that an all powerful being would create a world where evil exists
hard determinism believes that every action has a cause which means that people do not have free will
soft determinism - some things are predetermined but not others (e.g. weather)
god has created the universe and therefore he must be responsible for any suffering within it
moral argument from evil - if god is good he wouldn't let bad things happen
libertarian view - free will exists because it allows us to make genuine moral decisions without being influenced by external factors
hard determinism - everything is predetermined including human action
hard determinism states that every action is caused by previous events which were also caused by other events etc. This means that people do not have free will and cannot choose what they do
incompatibilists believe that free will cannot coexist with determinism
theodicies argue that if people were not able to do wrong then it would mean that they could never truly do anything right either
incompatibilists believe that if everything is predetermined then there is no real freedom of choice
theodicies argue that human beings need freedom to choose between right and wrong because this makes them more valuable as moral agents