Null hypothesis suggests nocausal relationship exists between the independent variable and the dependent variable
Alternative hypothesis suggests a causalrelationship between IV and DV
IV is changed
DV is measured
P=<0.05: Psychologists accept a 1 in 20 chance that their results are due to chance variation
P=<0.05 means there is less than a 5% probability the results gained are due to chance
P=<0.01: Is occasionally used by psychologists, this level of significance is usually required of studies attempting to support a particularly controversial theory or if the psychologist is conducting a replication
Using the P=<0.01 level reduces the probability of accepting the alternate hypothesis in error to less than 1 in 100
Type I (1) error
When researchers accept the alternate hypothesis (reject null) in error
Data collected has passed the level of significance, but really the findings were due to chance variation
Using P=<0.05 means this will happen in around 1 in 20 studies
Type II (2) error
when researchers reject the alternate hypothesis (accept null) in error
data collected has not passed the level of significance
but really the participants not acting as expected is due to chance variation hiding the causal relationship between IV & DV
To reduce the chance of a Type 1 error, a researcher can decide to use a P=<0.01 level of significance, however, this then increases the likelihood of a Type 2 error
Using P=<0.05 reduces the chance of a Type 2 error but increases the possibility of a Type 1 error