fairly clear cut approach to morality by establishing common rules( not to kill)
Enforcement of justice system, justification for common human laws
supports international laws by judging morality of cultures
concerned with human emotions, positive view on humans, flourishing sosciety is not restricted ( development of character)
More flecible, secondary alters on circumstances, cultures -> stealing in order to provide for family
weaknesses of natural moral law
Neilsen argued Aq was wrong to argue there was a single human nature common to all societies, there's diversity in what is considered to be moral in various cultures
G.E Moore critiqued Aquinas for committed naturalisticfallacy, just because we see people do things doesn't mean it's right or moral
Freud argued people are naturally selfish but moralised by upbringing
this is observable in nature (war, exploitation, trafficking)
what is natural moral law?
idea that there is a natural order to our world that must be followed
belief that morality should be based in human nature and have a search for happiness
what did Aquinas believe?
NML could be used to reflect on our human nature and work out a telos
what did Aquinas believe the Bible was?
inerrant and perfect
what are the 4 causes?
material
formal (structure)
efficient (made how?)
final (purpose)
what did Aristotle believe the final cause of humans was?
Eudaimonia
--> human flourishing, wellbeing and a good life
what are the 4 aspects of Aquinas?
Eternal law( God's principles)
Divine law ( rules as guidance)
Natural law (God's moral law built into humans
Human law ( dervived from reason)
what are the primary precepts?
established by reason, teleological aspect and apply to everyone
1)the innocent
2)order society
3)worship God
4)educate the young
5)reproduce
what are the secondary precepts?
more relative and vary by culture
never contradict the primary precepts
produced by reason to guide to an ultimate good (wisdom, creativity)