Where anxiety causes the witness to focus their attention on the weapon being used in a crime, leads to difficulties in recalling the other details accurately
How did Johnson and Scott investigate anxiety on EWT?
Participants sat in a waiting room believing they were going to take part in a lab study. The low anxiety condition heard a disagreement and then a man left holding a pen. The high anxiety condition overheard a heated argument, crash of equipment then a man emerged holding a bloodyknife. Participants were then asked to pick the man out of 50 photos
What were the results of Johnson and Scotts experiment?
49% in the low anxiety condition and 33% in the high anxiety condition were able to correctly identify the man
What were the conclusions of Johnson and Scottsexperiment?
Anxiety decreased the accuracy of EWT, the “weapon focus effect“ describes the findings
How did Christianson and Hubinette investigate the effect of anxiety on EWT?
Questioned 58 real witnesses to bankrobberies. They were either victims (bankemployees) who were directly threatened or bystanders (customers)
What were the findings to Christianson and Hubinettes research?
All witnesses showed generally good memories for details, better than 75% accurate recall. Those who where the most anxious had the best recall of all
What was the conclusion of Christiansen and hubinettes research?
Anxiety has a positive effect on EWT
How is the contradicting evidence explained?
Through the Yerkes-Dodson law
What is the Yerkes-Dodson law?
Performance will increase with anxiety, but only to a certain point, after which performance will decrease
Evaluation - Unusualness not Anxiety:
Pickel
Carried out experiment using scissors, a handgun, wallet and raw chicken in a hairdressers
EWT was poorest in the more unusual conditions (chicken and handgun)
Limitations of Johnson and Scotts study?
Ethical issues - deception of participants
Strength of Christianson and Hubinette?
Ecological validity - a reallife event compared to the artificial event of Johnson and Scott
Limitation of Christianson and Hubinette?
The interviews took place a long time after the event so they had no control over confounding variables and post-event discussion