Application

Cards (6)

  • Outline ACE-V
    • Structured approach to fingerprint identification used in US & UK
    • Thorough examination of unknown latent print to observe ridge patterns, shape & sweat pores
    • Assessment of all various cases of distortion & effect on print clarity
    • Examiner concentrates on known inked prints - observe ridge detail & compare detail in latent print
    • 2 prints examined together finding features in unknown print & then in known. Corresponding features evaluated to see if within tolerance for clarity
    • All positive identification must be verified by second qualified expert & may repeat process blind
  • Who in background theory supports ACE-V?
    • Bottom-up processing observing ridge detail before making cognitive translation
    • Mayfield
  • Outline Linear Sequential Unmasking
    • Experts should work in a linear fashion when analysing evidence
    • Reasoning process should work from the evidence to the suspect
    • Experts should firstly examine and document the trace evidence from the crime scene before being exposed to the case report
    • Sequential unmasking - idea that other evidence other than fingerprint is “unmasked” as late as possible and only when necessary
  • Who in background theory supports linear sequential unmasking?
    • Top down processing
    • Charlton - emotions can influence analysis, on 13 experienced fingerprint experts, found theme in satisfaction in catching suspect
    • Dror - high emotional context, low emotional context, found ambiguous pairs of prints influenced by emotional circumstances of case
  • Outline training fingerprint experts / juries
    • Train fingerprint experts as part of training to raise awareness of cognitive bias and give them updates every year
    • Train them on case where analysis was done wrong and consequences of misidentification
    • Can also be done as part of police training, with leaflets and regular accuracy checks
  • Who in background theory supports training fingerprint experts / juries?

    • Kassin - forensic evidence is not infallible
    • Hampikian - forensic evidence convicting innocent individuals
    • Dror - additional information can influence outcome and concept of training reduces bias