Save
...
Forensics
Area 2
Application
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Learn
Created by
Olivia Wainwright
Visit profile
Cards (6)
Outline ACE-V
Structured
approach to fingerprint identification used in
US
&
UK
Thorough
examination of
unknown
latent
print to observe
ridge
patterns, shape &
sweat
pores
Assessment of all various cases of
distortion
&
effect
on print
clarity
Examiner concentrates on
known
inked
prints - observe
ridge
detail &
compare
detail in
latent
print
2 prints examined together finding features in
unknown
print & then in
known.
Corresponding
features evaluated to see if within tolerance for
clarity
All
positive
identification must be verified by
second
qualified
expert
& may
repeat
process
blind
Who in background theory supports ACE-V?
Bottom-up processing
observing
ridge
detail
before making cognitive
translation
Mayfield
Outline
Linear
Sequential
Unmasking
Experts should work in a
linear
fashion when analysing evidence
Reasoning process should work from the
evidence
to the
suspect
Experts should firstly examine and
document
the
trace evidence
from the crime scene
before
being exposed to the
case report
Sequential
unmasking
- idea that other evidence other than fingerprint is “unmasked” as
late
as possible and only when
necessary
Who in background theory supports linear sequential unmasking?
Top
down
processing
Charlton
-
emotions
can influence analysis, on
13
experienced
fingerprint experts, found theme in
satisfaction
in
catching
suspect
Dror
-
high emotional context
,
low emotional context
, found
ambiguous
pairs of prints influenced by
emotional
circumstances
of case
Outline training fingerprint experts / juries
Train
fingerprint experts as part of
training
to raise
awareness
of
cognitive
bias
and give them
updates
every
year
Train them on
case
where analysis was done
wrong
and
consequences
of misidentification
Can also be done as part of
police
training,
with
leaflets
and regular
accuracy
checks
Who in background theory supports
training
fingerprint experts / juries?
Kassin
-
forensic
evidence is not
infallible
Hampikian
- forensic evidence convicting
innocent
individuals
Dror
- additional
information
can
influence
outcome and concept of training
reduces
bias