nomothetic and idiographic

Cards (11)

  • nomothetic definition
    general laws of human behaviour
    nomos = numbers
    template against which people can be compared
    usually quantitative
  • idiographic definition
    describing the natural of the individual, usually no intention to generalise to a larger group
    idio = individual
    usually produce qualitative data in case studies
  • example of nomothetic approach
    anything biological, behavioural
  • example of idiographic approach
    humanistic, psychodynamics?
  • research methods in nomothetic
    scientific methods like hypothesis testing, objectivity, predictability, falsifiability etc
  • research methods in idiographic
    not experimental techniques like case studies
  • integrative approach
    combining nomothetic and idiographic
    for example, developing a general law and using case studies to test it or vice versa
  • nomothetic - evaluation. for
    scientific compared to idiographic
    experiments follow the scientific method
    making general laws is objective, predicting behaviour allows treatment to develop
    upholds the scientific rigour in psychology
  • nomothetic - evaluation. against
    ignores critical detail in the unique human experience
    superficial outlook on humans
    e.g biological psychology sees humans as fixable numbers wherea humanistic takes into account the whole scope of the individual and their unique characteristic
  • idiographic - evaluation. for
    detail discovered can add to or challenge established laws and theories
    for example, the KF case study caused the paradigm to shift from the MSM to the WMM, as their verbal deficit despite normal visual information staying intact showed that the short term memory is more complex than one box
    this shows the importance of the idiographic approach in research
  • idiographic - evaluation. against
    unscientific practices
    uses non experimental methods and therefore cannot be used universally as it's individual
    but! integrative approach makes it very valuable
    furthermore, researcher bias, usually longitudinal causing rapport to build and then a potential subjective interpretation
    lacks validity