types of experiments

    Cards (13)

    • laboratory experiment:
      researchers can easily manipulate the IV for an outcome on DV
      in controlled setting
      usually artificial
      participants know they are being studied but dont know aim
    • what are the strengths of lab experiment?
      high in internal validity
      control of extraneous variables as control setting
      easy to replicate
      demand characteristics likely
    • what are the limitations of lab experiment ?
      lacks mundane realism
      low in external validity so cannot be generalised
      low in ecological validity
      demand characteristics
    • field experiment:
      more natural setting
      participants dont know being studied
    • what are the strengths of a field experiment?
      high in external validity
      less likely for demand characteristics
      high in ecological validity
      high in mundane realism
      easier to generalise findings
    • what are the limitations of field experiment?

      extraneous variables more likely
      low in internal validity
      confounding variables more likely
      unethical
      harder to replicate
    • natural experiments:
      iv varies naturally without the manipulation of researcher as unethical to do so but DV still can be tested in lab
      researchers just measure the change
      e.g romanian orphans
    • what are strengths of natural experiments?
      high in ecological + external validity
      allow study of real life situation
      high in mundane realism
      cannot be replicated
    • quasi experiment:
      where the iv doesnt vary
      just a difference in characteristics between participants
    • strengths of quasi experiment?

      only way to study certain factors that are pre existing characteristics of participants
    • limitations of quasi experiment?
      other factors such as confounding variables could have changed with IV and so changed the DV
    • what is investigator effects/bias?
      anything investigator does that could effect participants performance
      can be indirect or direct
    • ways of dealing with investigator effects:
      • single blind = participants unaware of some details of experiment
      • double blind = both participants and investigator dont know the aim of the study
      • experimental realism= experimenter makes tasks more engaging to maintain participants attention to tasks not to the fact they being observed