Save
psychology research methods
types of experiments
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Share
Learn
Created by
tamara
Visit profile
Cards (13)
laboratory experiment:
researchers can easily
manipulate
the
IV
for an outcome on
DV
in
controlled
setting
usually
artificial
participants
know
they are being studied but
dont
know
aim
what are the strengths of lab experiment?
high
in internal validity
control of
extraneous
variables as control setting
easy to
replicate
demand
characteristics likely
what are the limitations of lab experiment ?
lacks mundane realism
low in external validity so cannot be
generalised
low in ecological validity
demand characteristics
field experiment:
more
natural
setting
participants
dont
know being
studied
what are the strengths of a field experiment?
high
in
external
validity
less
likely for
demand
characteristics
high
in
ecological
validity
high in
mundane
realism
easier to generalise findings
what are the limitations of
field experiment
?
extraneous variables
more likely
low in
internal validity
confounding variables more likely
unethical
harder to replicate
natural experiments:
iv varies naturally without the manipulation of researcher as unethical to do so but DV still can be tested in lab
researchers just measure the change
e.g romanian orphans
what are strengths of natural experiments?
high in ecological +
external
validity
allow study of
real
life
situation
high in
mundane
realism
cannot be
replicated
quasi experiment
:
where the
iv
doesnt vary
just a difference in characteristics between participants
strengths of
quasi experiment
?
only way to study certain factors that are
pre existing
characteristics of participants
limitations of quasi experiment?
other
factors
such as
confounding
variables could have changed with
IV
and so changed the
DV
what is investigator effects/bias?
anything investigator does that could
effect
participants
performance
can be
indirect
or
direct
ways of dealing with investigator effects:
single
blind = participants
unaware
of some details of experiment
double
blind = both
participants
and
investigator
dont
know the
aim
of the study
experimental
realism=
experimenter
makes tasks more
engaging
to maintain participants
attention
to tasks not to the fact they being
observed