explanations of attachment

Cards (8)

  • learning theory(cupboard love)
    • we are born as blank slates
    • attachment is learned and the basis is food
    • infant forms attachment with whoever feeds it
    • learns to associate feeder (usually mother) with food
    • gradually feels pleasure even when she isnt feeding the infant
    • example of classical conditioning - associating 2 stimuli
  • bowlbys evolutionary theory
    • babies come into world biologically preprogrammed to form attachment as it helps them to survive
    • infant produces innate 'social releaser' behaviours - crying/smiling - these stimulate caregiving
    • determinant of attachment isnt food but care and responsiveness
    • children initially form 1 attachment and they act as a secure base and a template for all future relationships
  • classical conditioning

    • bottle (US) -> baby (UR)
    • parent (NS) + bottle (pairing) -> baby (UR)
    • parent (CS) -> baby (CR)
    attachment formed !
  • bowlbys evolutionary theory
    • monotropy - all children have an important initial attachment (who responds best to the social releasers)
    • internal working model - child learns what to expect from a relationship, created by attachment they have (trust or uncertainty)
    • critical period - attachments must form before child turns 2 and a half. otherwise risk maternal deprivation hypothesis - long term developmental consequences for life
  • learning theory eval :) - strengths
    • could explain characteristics of attachment like proximity seeking and seperation anxiety (theyre worrying about food)
  • learning theory eval :( - weaknesses
    • bowlby and lorenz argue attachment is innate rather than learnt
    • harlows monkeys preferred the one that provided comfort
    • shaffer and emerson - child formed attachment with most sensitive rather than who provided food
    • ignores emotion / love, cynical about relationships between children and parents
  • bowlbys theory eval :( - weaknesses
    • learning theory would argue attachment is learnt rather than innate
  • bolwbys theory eval :) - strengths
    • lorenz supports idea of imprinting / attachments are innate
    • glasgow study - supports idea of inital monotropy
    • consequences of harlows monkeys support critical period and internal working model
    • hazan and shavers love quiz supports internal working model in humans