Observations and techniques

Cards (10)

  • What is an observation?

    A technique where researchers will watch and record behaviour
  • Why are they used?
    • to study behaviour in more natural settings so the results are more realistic
    • to study behaviours which would be unethical to manipulate or cannot be directly manipulated by researcher e.g. observing aggression in sports or at a bar after drinking
  • Types of observations
    • participant or non-participant : observer becoming actively involved in situation or not
    • overt or covert : aware they're being observed or not
    • controlled or naturalistic : watching behaviour in a controlled or natural setting
  • Participant vs non-participant
    Strength of participant/weakness of non-participant:
    • the researcher can experience the situation so can give insight - researcher can lose valuable insight if not involved
    Weakness of participant/strength of non-participant:
    • researcher is involved so results are likely to be subjective - if researcher isn't involved they can remain more objective
  • Overt vs covert
    Strength of overt/weakness of covert:
    • PPs know they're being observed so observation is more ethical - if PPs are unaware there are ethical issues like lack of consent
    Weakness of overt/strength of covert:
    • a PP knowing they're observed may lead them to act a certain way (Hawthorne effect, 'Screw you' effect, social desirability) - if PPs are unaware of observation there is less likely to be demand characteristics
  • Controlled vs naturalistic
    Strength of controlled/weakness of naturalistic:
    • setting is controlled so extraneous variables are less likely - if environment is natural it is difficult to replicate because of extraneous varibales
    Weakness of controlled/strength of naturalistic:
    • as setting is controlled behaviours are less likely to be realistic - if observation is in a natural settings the behaviours are more likely to be natural too
  • Inter-observer reliability
    The extent to which two observers agree when assessing or observing behaviours - there should be at least 80% agreement
  • How to achieve inter-observer reliability
    • have multiple observers
    • create behavioural categories beforehand (should be defined, observable and measurable)
    • observe same behaviour at same time
    • compare observations and calculate correlation between them
    • could also record scene using a camera
  • Sampling methods
    Event sampling:
    • counting number of times a particular behaviour (event) occurs in a target group
    Time sampling:
    • recording behaviour within a pre-established time frame e.g. every 30 seconds
  • Event vs time sampling
    Strength of event/weakness of time:
    • behaviours may occur frequently which won't be missed - instances when a behaviour is sampled may be unrepresentative of observation as a whole
    Weakness of event/strength of time:
    • if event is quite complex some behaviours may be overlooked - less observations have to be made therefore less time consuming