Retrieval failure (cues)

Cards (33)

  • What is one reason people forget information?
    Insufficient cues
  • What does retrieval failure refer to in long-term memory?
    Lack of accessibility, not availability
  • What happens when someone provides a hint during recall?
    The memory might pop back into your head
  • What is the Encoding Specificity Principle (ESP)?
    • Cues must be present at encoding and retrieval
    • Different cues lead to forgetting
    • Meaningful cues enhance recall
  • Who conducted research into retrieval failure and the Encoding Specificity Principle?
    Tulving
  • What are the two types of cues mentioned in the study material?
    External cues and internal cues
  • What is Context-Dependent Forgetting?
    • Recall is affected by the environment
    • Learning and recall contexts must match
    • Different contexts can hinder memory retrieval
  • What did Godden and Baddeley (1975) study involve?
    Deep sea divers recalling words (context effects)
  • How many conditions were created in Godden and Baddeley's study?
    Four conditions
  • What was the result of the non-matching conditions in Godden and Baddeley's study?
    Accurate recall was 40% lower
  • Why is the recall lower in non-matching conditions?
    Different environments hinder memory retrieval
  • What did Baddeley (1997) argue about context effects?
    • Context effects are not very strong
    • Different contexts must be significantly different
    • Similar environments do not cause much forgetting
  • What was the focus of Godden and Baddeley's (1980) replication study?
    Recognition test instead of recall
  • What was the outcome of the recognition test in Godden and Baddeley's (1980) study?
    No context-dependent effect was observed
  • What limitation does the context effect present?
    • Context effects do not explain much forgetting
    • Real-life applications are limited
    • Context must be very different to see effects
  • What test found that if a cue helps recall it has to be present at encoding and recall?
    Tulving (1983) and is known as the encoding specificity principle
  • Who argues that context effects are not very strong?
    Baddeley
  • What does Baddeley (1997) suggest about context effects in real life?
    They are not very strong
  • What must different contexts be like to observe context effects?
    Very different indeed
  • Why is it hard to find an environment as different from land as underwater?
    Because they are fundamentally different environments
  • What is likely to happen when learning in one room and recalling in another?
    Little forgetting occurs
  • Why is the similarity of environments a limitation in context effects?
    It limits real-life applications of retrieval failure
  • What are the implications of Baddeley's findings on context effects for real-life applications?
    • Context effects are weak in real life
    • Different contexts must be very distinct
    • Limited explanation for forgetting in practical scenarios
  • What is the concept of state-dependent memory?
    Memory retrieval is influenced by internal cues.
  • Who conducted a study on state-dependent memory in 1998?
    Carter and Cassaday
  • What effect did antihistamines have on participants in Carter and Cassaday's study?
    They made participants sleepy.
  • In what year did Yleam conduct research related to state-dependent memory?
    1913
  • What was the focus of carter and cassaday research
    The relationship between cues and recall.
  • What does the term "internal cue" refer to in the context of memory retrieval?
    It refers to cues originating from within the individual.
  • What is the significance of the findings from Carter and Cassaday's study?
    They support the concept of state-dependent memory.
  • What is meant by "internal cue" in memory studies?
    Internal cues are mental states influencing recall.
  • What methodological aspects could be explored in Carter and Cassaday's study?
    Participants' conditions and measurement of recall.
  • What implications do the findings of these studies have for understanding memory?
    They highlight the importance of context in recall.