any relatively usual behaviour can be seen as ‘ normal ‘ and anything different to this is ‘abnormal’
can only deal with reliably measured characteristics
1 and +1 = ‘ normal ’, -2 and +2 = ‘ unusual ’, -3 and -3 = ‘ abnormal ’
what is abnormality ?
when a person’s behaviour is sufficientlyunusual ( abnormal ) to diagnose and treat them with a psychological disorder
what is statistical infrequency in terms of iq ?
average iq is 100
68% of people have iq between 85-115
only 2% have lower than 70 – ‘ abnormal ’
liable to intellectual disability disorder
what are the strengths of statistical infrequency ?
it has reallife-application in the diagnosis of intellectual disability disorder.
it is objective.
what are the limitations of statistical infrequency ?
some characteristics can be desirable.
where someone is living a happy and fulfilled life, there is no benefit to them being labelled as abnormal.
what is the impact of culture on social norms ?
social norms may be different in cultures and generations
few behaviours can be considered universally ‘ abnormal ’ when considering social norms
for example : homosexuality
brunei ( 2019 ) – homosexuality punishable by death
what is cultural relativism ?
when one culture may label something as abnormal using their standards of normal whereas another culture may see this as normal. social norms are defined by a dominant culture and then applied to people from other cultural groups.
what is antisocial personality disorder ?
classified by impulsive,
aggressive, and irresponsible behaviour
the DSM-5 lists one important symptom as an ‘ absence of prosocial internal standards associated with failure to conform to lawful or culturally normative ethical behaviour ’
what are the strengths of deviation of social norms ?
it has real-lifeapplication.
it is holistic.
what are the limitations to deviation of social norms ?
social norms vary from generations and cultures.
can lead to systematic abuse of human rights.
what is deviation of ideal mental health ?
a different approach is to look away from abnormal and consider ‘ normal ‘.
an absence of any ideal mental health characteristic can be considered as ‘ abnormal ’.
deviating from ideal mental health = abnormality
what is the criteria for ideal mental health ? jahoda ( 1958 )
we are symptom-free – no symptoms or distress
we are rational – can perceive ourselves accurately
we are self-actualised – we have achieved our potential
we are unstressed
we are realistic – we have a realistic view of the world
we have good self-esteem
we are independent of other people
we can successfully work, love and enjoy our leisure
what are the strengths of deviation of ideal mental health ?
it is very comprehensive.
what are the limitations to deviation of ideal mental health ?
the idea of cultural relativism.
it sets an unrealistically high standard for mental health.
the idea of labelling.
what are the signs that somebody is not coping ? rosenhan and seligman ( 1989 )
personal distress – feeling upset
maladaptive behaviour – behaving oddly
unpredictability – erratic behaviour
irrationality – doing illogical or dangerous things
observer discomfort – others don’t like what is happening
violation of moral standards – breaking societies and interpersonal rules
unconventionality – not following normal standards
what are the strengths of failure to function adequately ?
it does attempt to include the subjective experience of the individual.
what are the limitations of failure to function adequately ?