when societies adopt new attitudes, beliefs and ways as a whole instead of an individual
How is social change shown through minority influence?
consistency
commitment
what are some real life examples of consistency through minority influence - social change?
Martin Luther king & Nelson Mandela: leading the civil right movement
suffragettes
Moscovici's study ->the importance of consistency
what was Moscovici's study?
Moscovici looked into the effect of a consistent minority.
results: when a minority was consistent then they were 8.42% likely to convince the majority that the blue slides were actually green, than an inconsistent minority in group 1. Group 2: inconsistent minority 1.25% & Group 3: no minority 0.25%
how can minorities show commitment?
commitment can be shown through the 'augmentation principle' to appear more influential and dedicated to their view as they are taking risks and making sacrifices to be heard
what is a real life example of commitment of a minority influence - social change?
Commitment -> Rosa Parks: she refused to give up her seat on a bus in the 1950s and she was arrested for violating the US law, but triggered the Civil Rights Movement
how else can a minority influence social change?
through similarity -> if a minority are similar in age, gender, class or sexuality to a majority then they can be more influential
what is a real life example of a minority being similar to a majority to influence social change?
study: Maass et al1982 -> suggested the idea of group membership
study's results: a minority with heterosexual men were more likely to convince a majority of heterosexual men about gay rights, therefore similarity is am important factor
what are some real life examples of consistency through minority influence - social change?
Suffragettes
Moscovici's study
Martin Luther King & Nelson Mandela -> leading the civil rights movement
how did the Suffragettes influence social change?
consistency -> diachronic consistency (saying the same view for a long period of time): Female rights including to vote through the use of political an educational arguments
commitment -> making significant sacrifices (augmentation principle): hunger strikes, imprisonment & death
group membership -> convincing other women that they needed to join their cause
how did the Civil Rights Movement influence social change?
consistency -> retained diachronic consistency (over several years): peacefully & non-aggressively presenting their cause
deeper processing -> people in the majority accepted their status and began thinking of the unjustness of their situation
augmentation principle -> groups took risks to show their commitment to their cause e.g. The Freedom Riders: challenged segregation on transport
snowball effect -> when Martin Luther King gradually got the attention of the American Government
define 'social crypto-amnesia'
when there is a gradual social change in peoples view to a majority from a minority, but no one can explain how it has happened except that it has happened
how can conformity influence social change?
Asch'sunanimity variation
Environmental Activist campaigns
how does Asch's unanimity variation effect social change?
unanimity variation -> using a lone dissenter to give social support to the naive participant in a group setting, breaking the power of the majority
variation's findings -> lone dissenter decreased conformity to 5.5% when they agreed with the participants answer, and decreased conformity to 9% when the lone dissenter didn't support the majority or the naive participant
the lone dissenter encouraged others to break away from the power of the majority, leading to social change
how do Environmental Health Activists effect social change?
adverts used in their campaigns use normative social influence to draw attention to the dangers of our social norms
example of social norms include: drinking, vaping, smoking
these adverts try to break these bad habits of the majority and encourage social change by showing the majority the consequences of their actions
how can obedience effect social change?
Milgram's experiment
Zimbardo
how does Milgram's 2 rebel study effect social change?
2 rebel study -> Milgram added one/two other teachers to the existing teacher. These confederates would then say that they wish to width draw from the study - showing disobedience & being a role model
findings: rate of obedience dropped to 10% from 65% (baseline)
the other teachers act as a role model for social change as they disobeyed the orders they were given and provided support for the other teacher (naïve participant) to disobey as well
how does Zimbardo effect social change?
Zimbardo suggested that obedience of a small instruction can be used to create social change through gradual commitment (building up smaller instructions till they get bigger and more difficult to resist)
therefore suggesting that people will slowly drift into a different kind of behaviour
research support of Social change -> Nolan et al 2008
Nolan et al 2008 aimed to see if they could change peoples' energy use habits
procedure: hung messages on front doors of houses in San Diego everyday for 1 month to reduce energy usage
findings: there was a significant decrease in energy usage in group 1 than group 2 as group 1 had posters that would tell you how to save, and group 2 didn't have tips on saving energy
explanation of Nolan et al research support
this is a strength because:
temporal validity - task still practiced today
ecological validity - can be generalised to the real world
mundane realism - task is similar to events that happen in real life
valid explanation through NSI (operationalised)
counterpoint of Nolan et al research for social change
counterpoint -> Foxcroft et al:
procedure:
reviewed social norm interventions/groups as part of the Gold Standard Cochrane Collaboration
reviewed 70 social studies to reduce alcohol consumption in students
findings: researchers found that students reduced the quantity of their drinking but not their frequency
this is a counterpoint because:
NSI doesn't always produce long term change
strength of social change
strength -> Nethem2009: psychologists can explain how minority influence can bring social change
Nethem claims that change occurs through the thinking that minorities inspire -> when people consider minorities arguments and engage in divergent thinking, they broaden their views, allowing them to weigh the pros and cons
nethem argues this leads to better decisions & solutions -> showing how dissenting minorities are valuable