Goslings showed imprinting behaviour with mother and Lorenz, depending on the group placed
Both groups were placed together with mother and Lorenz present, the goslings divided into their 'imprinting' groups quickly and followed them
CONCLUSION: animals imprint on the firstpersistentlypresentmoving object seen at birth (security)
Irreversible and long-lasting, changing adult behaviour as well
Imprinting
Attaching to the first moving object seen
Harlow (1959) -monkey study
A monkey was exposed to a 'wire mother' containing a feeding bottle and a 'cloth mother'
Monkey spent most of its time with the 'cloth mother' for comfort, occasionally going for food (17 hrs compared to >1 hr a day)
When frightened with mechanical bear, monkey clung to 'cloth mother'
CONCLUSION: infants develop an attachment to those who provide comfort, not those who feed them, there is a critical period of 90 days before effects were irreversible
Long term effects - social + sexual abnormalities and many other negative consequences from trauma
What do both animal studies say about attachment?
Attachment is innate
There is a critical period of time for attachment after birth
There is a big importance of attachment at youth to long-term development (e.g. reproduction can be affected)
Ethical issues with research by Lorenz and Harlow
Imprinting is irreversible
Monkey was frightened - lasting emotional harm
Animals found it difficult to form relationships with their peers after research