Obedience - Milgram

    Cards (9)

    • Obedience:
      A form of social influence in which an individual follows a direct order. Usually receiving the order from a position of authority.
    • Why Milgram wanted to create an obedience study:
      • Milgram was Jewish
      • He was interested to see whether the Germans were different and where they more likely to be obedien
    • Baseline procedure:
      • He only recruited men to participate
      • Happened in Yale university
      • There was a learner (a confederate) a teacher ( the participant) and an experimenter
      -Participant read out the questions
      • Learner tries to repeat the words and if its wring the teacher delivers an electric shock
      • The shock was able to reach up to 450V and started at 15V ( there was 30 increments)
      • The shocks weren't wear however the participant didn't know this
      • participants were told to continue even if the actor were showing 'pain'
      • as the voltage increased some participants show signs of resistance.
    • Milgram's students predictions:
      They guessed the amount of participants that would give the highest shock would be 3% when it was actually 65%
    • Pre-procedure:
      • Mr Wallace was always the learner
      • confederate wore lab coat
      • people received money on arrival
      • Told they could leave at any point
    • Findings of the baseline procedure:
      • 100% of participants continued to 300V
      • 12.5% stopped after this
      • 65% continued to 450V
      • participants showed extreme tension
      • 84% said they were glad they took part
    • Strength: Research support
      His findings were replicated in a French documentary
      Focused on a game show were the participants believed they were the contestants
      They completed a variations of Milgram's study infront of a TV audience
      80% delivered the maximum shock
      Showed nervous behaviour just like Milgram's study
    • Limitation: Low internal validity
      • Milgram reported that 75% believed that the shocks were genuine
      • Orne and Holland argued participants behaved the way they did because they didn't believe in the set up so were acting for demand characteristics
    • Limitation: Ethical issues
      • the participants were deceived
      • the participants thought that role allocation was random
      • they also thought the shock's were real
    See similar decks