coding, capacity and duration of memory

Cards (30)

  • coding is...

    the format in which information is stored in various memory stores
  • capacity is...

    the amount of memory that can be held in a memory store
  • duration is...

    the length of time that information can be held in a memory store
  • what is short-term memory?

    the limited-capacity memory store
  • what is long-term memory?

    the permanent memory store
  • who conducted research on coding?
    baddelely (1966a, 1966b)
  • what was the procedure of baddeley's research?

    giving lists of different words to different groups of participants and asking them to recall the words
  • what are some examples of these groups of words?
    • group 1 = acoustically similar (cat, car, cab)
    • group 2 = acoustically dissimilar (pit, few, cow)
    • group 3 = semantically similar (great, large, big)
    • group 4 = semantically dissimilar (hot, huge, good)
  • how did participants perform when having to do the recall task immediently after hearing the words?

    they tended to do worse on acoustically similar words
  • how did participants perform when having to do the task after a twenty minute interval?

    they tended to perform worse on semantically similar words
  • what did baddeley's study demonstrate?

    suggests that information is stored semantically in long-term memory
  • what is the capacity of short-term memory?

    5 to 9 items
  • what is the duration of short-term memory?

    18 to 30 seconds
  • what is the capacity of long-term memory?

    potentially unlimited
  • what is the duration of long-term memory?

    unlimited
  • what did miller's research argue?

    that because most things come in sevens (days of the week, colours of the rainbow, notes on a musical scale) we on average can recall that many items
  • what is chunking?

    when we break down a longer list that we need to remember in order to make it easier
  • who conducted the digit span test?
    jacobs, 1887
  • what was the procedure of the digit span test?

    participant had to recall a list of digits in the correct order
    each time, another digit was added
  • what was the mean digit span for numbers?

    9.3
  • what was the mean digit span for letters?

    7.3
  • who conducted research on the duration of short-term memory?
    peterson and peterson (1959)
  • what occurred during peterson and peterson's study?

    24 students were given a random constonant syllable (example = YCG) and also given a 3 digit number
    participants had to count down backwards from the number that they were given, in order to prevent rehearsal
    participants were then asked to recall the 3 letters
  • what was the results of peterson and peterson's study?

    that the duration of STM is about 18 seconds (unless rehearsed)
  • who conducted research on the duration of long-term memory?
    bahrick et al (1975)
  • what was the procedure of bahrick et al's study?

    392 americans
    asked to recall from their high school yearbook - photo recognition and free recall tests (either naming from looking at the photos, or just attempting to remember)
  • what was the results of bahrick et al's study?

    after 15 years = 90% accuracy in photo recognition, 60% accuracy in free recall
    after 48 years = 70% accuracy in photo recognition, 30% accuracy in free recall
    demonstrates how LTM can potentially last a lifetime
  • what are some evaluation points for coding?
    supporting research suggests that STM uses acoustic coding and LTM uses semantic coding
    artificial stimuli - Baddeley's word lists had no real meaning in everyday life
    limited application and difficult to apply to everyday life
  • what are some evaluation points for capacity?
    the original digit span test has been replicated with similar results - even though it is very old
    miller may have over-estimated how many chunks people can recall on average - cowan (2001) found that 4 chunks (3-5) may be more likely to be recalled on average than 7
  • what are some evaluation points for duration?
    bahrick et al - used meaningful memories (real life yearbook) and so this study has high external validity, a "real" estimate of the duration of LTM
    peterson and peterson - used meaningless stimuli, doesn't reflect that of everyday life and so lacks external validity