This is because all introspections are recorded under strictly controlled conditions using the same stimulus and same standardised procedures with every participant, every time.
This is a strength because the introspections can be repeated, and the reliability of the data can be checked - starting point for psychology to be considered a science.
When introspections were replicated on the same people, with the same stimulus, later, consistent findings were not found suggesting that the data introspections produce may be unreliable.
This is because it relied on participants self-reporting their mental processes. It's difficult to explain our own thought processes therefore participants may not have been explaining these accurately and data is also highly subjective.
This is a limitation because introspection may not successfully measure mental processes. It also suggests that introspection was flawed and would not meet today’s criteria of scientific enquiry.