What is a strength for the Ethological Explanation of Aggression?
Research Support
Brunner et al (1993) showed that the MAOA-L gene is closely associated with aggressive behaviour in humans, as well as Wilson & Daly (1996) showed that aggression is an adaptive behaviour, and therefore genetically based
Twin and adoption studies also showed that there is a significant genetic component to aggression in humans
This suggests the ethological approach is correct in claiming that aggression is genetically determined, heritable and adaptive
What is a limitation for the Ethological Explanation of Aggression?
External Validity
Nisbett (1993) found that one type of homicide as a result of reactiveaggression was more common amongst white men in the southern US than in the north
He concluded that the difference was caused by a ’culture of honour’ in the south, showing that the aggressive behaviour comes from a learned social norm, rather than being instinctive
Therefore, culture can override innate predispositions, which is hard for the ethological theory to explain
What is a limitation for the Ethological Explanation of Aggression?
Ritualistic Aggression
Goodall (2010) observed a ‘4-year war’ in which male chimps from one community killed the members of another in a systematic way
Occasionally, a victim would be held down by rival chimps, while others beat it, despite the victims offering appeasement signals
This challenges the ethological view that same-species aggression has evolved into a self-limiting and relatively harmless ritual
What is a limitation for the Ethological Explanation of Aggression?
Fixed Action Potentials are not Fixed
Lorenz saw fixed action potentials as innate and unchanging, but Hunt (1973) pointed out that fixed action potentials are influenced by environmental factors and learning experiences
For example, the duration of each behaviour in an aggressive action potential varies between individuals, and even in the same individual depending on the encounter, resulting in many ethologists preferring the term ‘modal behaviour pattern’
Therefore, patterns of aggressive behaviour are much more flexible than Lorenz thought, especially in humans