a processwhich takes place before a study is published where the work is reviewed by other workers in that field for validity, reliability or any other methodological flaws
why peer review is important in psychological research?
ensure only high qualityresearch Is published (credible with appropriate design and methodology)
ensures anything published has integrity, not biased, can be taken seriously by fellow researchers and lay people
research often has applications to real life, so quality needs to be reviewed so any recommendations/guidelines can be accurately founded and there is no negative consequences for affected individuals
can assess the significance of the research in wider context and how original work is/refers to relevant research used
how does peer review work
Submission:
An author submits their work (e.g., a research paper) to a journal or publisher.
2. Initial Review:The editor of the journal or publisher assesses the work for relevance and suitability.
3. Peer Review:The editor then selects experts (peers) in the field to review the submitted work.
4. Review Process:Reviewers provide feedback on the work, including its strengths, weaknesses, and suggestions for improvement.
5. Editor's Decision:The editor considers the reviews and makes a decision about the work's acceptance, rejection, or revision.
limitations of peer review
The research may be so unique there are no experts;
reviewers may be adversaries in the exact same research area.
should be anonymous but with a small number of specialists everyone tends to know whose research it is.
may criticise research that invalidates or disputes theirs because of jealousy, loss of credibility
OPENPEER REVIEW: aware of each other's identities, comments may be made public. Usually it is submitted online to an open forum. increase transparency and accountability