Cognitive Explanations of offending

Subdecks (1)

Cards (19)

  • Cognitive Distortions
    Faulty, biased and irrational way of thinking that mean we perceive ourselves and other people inaccurately
  • Hostile Attribution Bias
    The tendency to judge ambiguous situations or the actions of others as aggressive and threatening when in reality it may not be
  • Minimilisation
    Type of deception that involves downplaying the significance of an event
  • Hostile Attribution Bias
    • Misinterpreting the actions of others lead and misreading non-aggressive cues leads to violent responses
    • Showed 55 violent offenders images of emotionally ambiguous facial expressions and compared with non aggressive control group the offenders were more likely to perceive images as angry and hostile
  • Hostile Attribution Bias Childhood
    • The root of this behaviour may be apparent in childhood
    • Showed children a video clip of an ambiguous provocation
    • Children who had been identified as 'aggressive' and 'rejected' prior to the study interpreted the situation as more hostile
  • Minimilisation
    • An attempt to deny or downplay the seriousness of an offence
    • Burglars may describe themselves as 'supporting family' as a way of minimising the seriousness of their offences
    • Offenders who commit sexual offences are prone to minimilisation
    • Among 25 rapists 54% denied they had committed an offence and 40% minimised the harm they caused to the victim
  • AO3 Cognitive Distortions: Real World Application
    • There is application to therapy
    • CBT aims to challenge irrational thinking
    • Offenders are encourage to face up to what they have done and establish a less distorted view of their actions
    • Reduced incidence of minimilisation is associated with reduced risk of reoffending
  • AO3 Cognitive Distortions: Type of offence
    • The level of cognitive distortion depends on the type of offence
    • Questionnaire responses were gathered from sexual offenders
    • Non contact sex offenders used more cognitive distortions than contact sex offenders
    • Those who had a previous history of offending were also more likely to use distortions as justification
    • Distortions are not the same for all offenders
  • AO3 Cognitive Distortions: Does not explain the cause
    • Cognitive theories are good at describing the criminal mind
    • May also help in reducing reoffending in the long term
    • Understanding minimilisation may be a useful start in therapy
    • Cognitive theories do not help in predicting future offender behaviour and the root of where the offender behaviour originates from
    • Distorted thinking does not mean you become an offender
  • AO3 Cognitive Distortions: Measuring is difficult
    • Attempting to quantify and measure cognitive distortions is problematic
    • Thoughts are subjective and are open to interpretation using self report methods
    • Cognitive explanations such as minimilisation may point out what characterises offending behaviour but not why