Holland (1967) repeated Milgram’s baseline study and measured whether participants were internals or externals
37% of internals did not continue to the highest shock level whereas 23% of externals did not continue
This shows that resistance is at least partly related to locus of control, which increases the validity of locus of control as an explanation of disobedience
AO3 - What is a limitation for Locus of Control?
Contradictory Research
Twenge et al (2004) analysed data from American locus of control studies conducted over a 40-year period
The data showed that people became more resistant to obedience but also more external
This suggests that locus of control is not a valid explanation of how people resist social influence
AO3 - What is a strength for Social Support?
Real-World Research Support
Albrechtet al (2006) evaluated an 8-week programme to help pregnant adolescents resist peer pressure to smoke in which they were given a buddy as social support
At the end of the programme, adolescents who had a buddy were significantly less likely to smoke compared to a control group of participants without a buddy
This shows that social support can help young people resist social influence as in intervention in the real world
AO3 - What is a strength for Social Support?
Research Support for Dissenting Peers
Gamson et al (1982) told participants to produce evidence that they would be used to help an oil company run a smear campaign
The researchers found higher levels of resistance in their study than Milgram did in his in which 88% groups of participants rebelled against their orders
This shows that peer support can lead to disobedience by undermining the legitimacy of an authority figure