Resistance to Social Influence

Cards (26)

  • What is independent behaviour in psychology?
    Behaviour not influenced by others
  • How can resisting pressure to conform be easier?
    If others are also resisting conformity
  • What does social support allow a person to do?
    Follow their own conscience
  • What effect does seeing another person disobey have?
    It challenges the legitimacy of authority
  • What is an internal locus of control?
    Belief in personal responsibility for outcomes
  • What is an external locus of control?
    Belief that life is controlled by outside forces
  • How do people with a high internal locus of control behave?
    They resist pressure to conform and obey
  • What traits do people with a high internal locus of control tend to have?
    Self-confidence, intelligence, achievement-oriented
  • What did Holland (1967) find in his study related to locus of control?
    Internals resisted obedience more than externals
  • What does Twenge et al (2004) suggest about locus of control over time?
    People became more resistant but also more external
  • What does Rotter (1982) suggest about locus of control's influence?
    It only influences new situations
  • What happens if someone has previously obeyed a situation?
    They are likely to obey again
  • What is social support in the context of conformity?
    Presence of others resisting pressure
  • What did Asch investigate regarding conformity?
    The effect of unanimity on conformity
  • How does a dissenter affect conformity?
    They act as an ally, decreasing conformity
  • What did Milgram find when he replicated his study with a disobedient confederate?
    Obedience dropped from 65% to 10%
  • What did Albrecht et al (2006) evaluate regarding social support?
    An 8-week program for pregnant adolescents
  • What was the outcome of Albrecht et al's program?
    Adolescents with buddies smoked less
  • What did Gamson et al (1982) find in their study?
    Higher resistance levels than Milgram's study
  • What percentage of participants rebelled in Gamson et al's study?
    88% of groups rebelled against orders
  • What are the key concepts related to resistance to social influence?
    • Independent behaviour
    • Social support
    • Locus of control (internal and external)
    • Influence of dissenting peers
  • What are the strengths and weaknesses of locus of control as an explanation for disobedience?
    Strengths:
    • Supported by Holland's research
    • Validates internal locus of control

    Weaknesses:
    • Contradicted by Twenge et al's findings
    • Limited influence in familiar situations
  • AO3 - What is a strength for Locus of Control?
    Research Support
    • Holland (1967) repeated Milgram’s baseline study and measured whether participants were internals or externals 
    • 37% of internals did not continue to the highest shock level whereas 23% of externals did not continue
    • This shows that resistance is at least partly related to locus of control, which increases the validity of locus of control as an explanation of disobedience
  • AO3 - What is a limitation for Locus of Control?
    Contradictory Research
    • Twenge et al (2004) analysed data from American locus of control studies conducted over a 40-year period
    • The data showed that people became more resistant to obedience but also more external
    • This suggests that locus of control is not a valid explanation of how people resist social influence
  • AO3 - What is a strength for Social Support?
    Real-World Research Support
    • Albrecht et al (2006) evaluated an 8-week programme to help pregnant adolescents resist peer pressure to smoke in which they were given a buddy as social support
    • At the end of the programme, adolescents who had a buddy were significantly less likely to smoke compared to a control group of participants without a buddy
    • This shows that social support can help young people resist social influence as in intervention in the real world
  • AO3 - What is a strength for Social Support?
    Research Support for Dissenting Peers
    • Gamson et al (1982) told participants to produce evidence that they would be used to help an oil company run a smear campaign 
    • The researchers found higher levels of resistance in their study than Milgram did in his in which 88% groups of participants rebelled against their orders
    • This shows that peer support can lead to disobedience by undermining the legitimacy of an authority figure