Nolan et al (2008) hung messages that most of their neighbours were trying to reduceenergyusage in their area and as a control had a different message that made no reference to other people’s behaviour
There was a significant drop in energyusage in the first group compared to the control
This shows that conformity can lead to social change can lead to social change through the operation of normative social influence
AO3 - What is a strength for Social Change?
Minority Influence Explains Change
Nemeth (2009) claims social change is due to the type of thinking that minorities inspire and argues that it leads to better decisions and more creative solutions to social issues
When people consider minority arguments, they engage in divergent thinking, in which the thinker actively searches for information and weighs up more options
This shows why dissenting minorities are valuable, as they stimulate new ideas and open minds in a way that majorities cannot
AO3 - What is a limitation for Social Change?
Low Validity
Foxcroft et al (2015) reviewed social norms interventions which included 70 studies where the social norms approach was used to reduce student alcohol use
The researchers found that only a small reduction in drinking quantity and no effect on drinking frequency
Therefore it seems that using normative influence does not always produce long-term social change
AO3 - What is a limitation for Social Change?
Role of Deeper Processing
Mackie (1987) claims that the majority influence may create deeperprocessing if you do not share their views, rather than people thinking more deeply about the minority’s views
When we find that a majority believes something different, then we are forced to think long and hard about their arguments and reasoning
This means that a central element of minority influence has been challenged, casting doubt on its validity as an explanation of socialchange